Page 18 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 18

INTRODUCTION                     5

            while some have  even  COD;9emned  the  astronomical  method  as
            inaccurate  and conjectural. •  It is,  however,  admitted  that  "  if
            the  astronomical  data  on which  conclusions as to the  age of  the
            Veda  have  been built  implied  all that they  were  represented  to
            imply,  the  earliest  periods  of  Vedic  poetry  will  have  to  be
              ..
            rearranged.t
               It appears  to  me  that  scholars  have  erred  too  much  on  the
            side  of overcautiousness  in  condemning  this  method.  I  do  not
            mean  to  say that there are no difficulties;  but  sufficient  care does
            not appear to have  been taken to always  keep  in  view_ the  main
            point of the inquiry,  by separating it from  the  mas~ of irrelevant
            matter,  with which,  in some cases,  it becomes  unavoidably  mixed
           up.  Some  of :Bentley's  speculations  for  instance,  a;e  ·@deed  in-
           genious and suggestive, but he relies too much upon Pura11ic tradi-
           tions,  mere  etymological  speculations  and  his  own  calculations
           based thereon,  instead  of trying to find  out  whether there is  any-
           thing in the earlier works to corroborate or support these traditions.
           On the other hand, Prof. Weber's  Essay,  which,  as a collection of
           astronomical  allusions  and  references  in  the  Vedic  literature,  is
           extremely valuable, is taken up by the controversy as to the origin
            of the Nak~hatras raised by M.  Biot; and the same  thing  may be
           said  of  Prof.  Whitney's  contributions  on  the  subject.~  Various
           other  questions,  such  as  whether  the  Vedic  cycle  comprised  five
           or six  years,  how  and  when  the  intercalary days  or months  were
           inserted  to  make  the  lunar correspond  with  the  solar  year,  have
           also caused the attention of scholars to be diverted from the broad
           astronomical  facts  and  observations  to  be  found  recorded  in  the
            Vedic  literature;  and  as  a  consequence  we  find  that  while  the
           questions  as  to  the  original  number  of the  Nak~hatras and  as  to
           whether the Chinese borrowed them from the Hindus or vice  versa,
           are so  ably discussed,  no systematic attempt has yet been  made to
            trace  back  the  astronomical  references  in  the  later  works  to  the
           Sruphitas, and to fully examine their bearing on the question of the
           age  and  character  of the  Vedas.  On  the  contrary,  Prof.  Weber
           asks us to reconcile ourselves to the fact that any  such search will,

               •  See 'Vcber's History of Indian Literature, p.  z,  note.
               t  Pref.  to \lig. Vol. IV,  p. lui.
               t  See  his essay  on the Hindu and  Chinese  systems of  Aiterisms
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23