Page 34 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 34

SACRIFICE  ALIAS  THE  YEAR           21

            the  southernmost  point, "  I  am  of opinion  however,  that  deva-
            yana and pitriyana,  or devaloka  and pitriloka were the only terms
             used  in  the  9ldest  times.  ·It is  a  nat.ural  inference  from  the  fact
             that the word uttarayaTJfl, as such,  does not occur in the  ~i~eda.
             The  fact,  that  Vi~hftvin was  the  central  day  of the  yearly  saira,
             further  shows  that  the  sacrificial  system  was  coeval  with  the
             division  of the  year  into  the  paths  of Devas  and  Piqi.s.  After  a
            certain period the beginning of the year was changed to the winter
             solstice,  and,  it was  some .time  after  this  change  was  made  that
            the words uttaraytl1JIJ and,dakfhi~yana came to be used to denote
             the  solstitial divisions  of  the  year.  But  devayana  and  pitriyana
             could  not  be  at  once  divested  of the  ideas  which  had  already
             become  associated  with them.  Thus  while  ne~ feasts  and  sacri-
            fices  came  to  be regulated according  to uttardy01JfJ  and  dakfhi~a­
            yana.  devaydna  and pit riyana  with aU  the 'associated  ideas  con-
             tinued- to  exist  by  the. side  of the  new  system,  until  they  became
             either  gradually assimilated  with  the  new  system  or  the  priests
             reconciled the new  and the old systems by allowing  option 'to ·indi-
             vjduals  to follow  whichever they deemed  best.  We must therefore
             talce  great  care  not  to  allow the  idea  of uttaraya1Ja,  as  we  now
             understand it, to obscure our vision in "interpreting the early Vedic
             traditions,  and  that too much care  can  never  be  taken  is  evident
             from  the fact that even  so  acute an astronomer  as  Bhaskaracharya
             was  at a  loss  to correctly u~derstand the tradition that the  Utta-
             dya~a was  the  day  of Devas.  In  his  Siddhanta  Shiromapi  he
             raises the question  how the uttarAyapa,  as  it was generally  under-
             stood in his  day, could  be 'the  day  of the  Devas.  He  admits  that
             the  celestial  beings  on Meru  at  the  North  Pole  behold  the  sun
             (during aU the six months) when he is in th~northern hemisphere
             (vii. 9 )  and  these  six  months may therefore  be  properly  calied
             their day. •  But  the  word  uttarayana  was then used  to denote the
             period  of six  months from  the winter  to  the summer solstice;  and

                •  In  the Surya Sldchanta .xii.  67  it  is  said  that  "At  Meru  Gods
             behold the sun,  after but a single rising, during the half of his revolution
             beginning  with  Aries;"  while  in  ::dv.  1)  the  u ttariya~a  is  said  to
             commen·ce  "from  the  sun's  entrance  into  Capricorn .  The author,
             however,  has not no.ticed the  tradition that ·rhe Uttarlylll}a is the day
             of  the  Devas  and  the  apparent  inconsistency  arising  there-from.
             Perhaps he  understood the tradition in  its  true sense.
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39