Page 400 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 400

THE  'COWS'  WALK                 185
          on the other side, or at the other end' and not ' something pervading,
          extending,  or  spreading  through  the  whole  extent  of anything. •
          Even Saya~a in his commentary on VII, 103, 7, the only place where
          the  word  Ati-ratra occurs  in  the  ~g-Veda, explains  it  to  mean
          ' that which is  past  or  beyond  the  night  ( ratrfm  atitya  vartate
          iti ati-rdtra!J  ),  and  Rudradatta  in  his  commentary on  the  Apas-
          thamba  Shrauta  Sutra  (XIV,  1,  1 ),  gives  the  same  explanation.
          The Ati-rdtra therefore,  denotes a  trans nocturnal sacrifice that is,
          performed at either end of the night. Now according to the Aitareya
          Brahma~a (IV,  5 ),  the  Ati-rdtra  sacrifice  is  performed  for  the
          purpose  of driving  out  the  Asuras  from  the  darkness  of night;
          and  the  Ta~~ya Brahma~a (IV,  1,  4- 5 )  tells  us  that Prajapati,
          who  first  perceived  the sacrifice,  created  from  it the twin  of day
          and  night ( aho-rdtre ).  It follows  from  this that the Ati-ratra was
          performed at the  close  of such  night as  gave  rise  to  the  ordinary
          days and nights,  or, in other words, the regular succession of days
          and nights followed  its performance.  This can only be the case if
          we  suppose that the Ati-ratra was performed at the end of a long
          continuous  night  in  regions  where  such  night  occurred.  With  us
          in the  temperate  or  the  tropical  zone,  ordinary  days  and  nights
          regularly  succeed  each  other  throughout  the  year  without  any
          break, and it is meaningless, if not absurd, to speak of the cycle of
          day  and  night  as  produced  from  a  particular  night  in  the  year.

          seems to be quite clear from  this passage, v1z., that Tlshtrya was the star
          by which the year  was  reckoned.  In  the T!r Yasht § s. springs of water
          are said  to flow  at the rising of Tishtrya,  who in§ r6  is  described  as
          'mingling his shape  w1th  light,' or 'moving  in  light,'§ 46.  All  these
          mcidents  can  te  satis!actorily  explained  if  we  suppose that,  after
          Tishtry's fight  with Apaosha,  lasting for  roo nights at  the longest,  the
          aerial waters, which communicated motion to the sun and other heavenly
          bodies (see Faravardin Yasht  53- 58) and  which lay stiii or stagnant
          during the time,  were set free to move again  along the  path  made  by
          Mazda bringing on "·ith them the light of the sun and  thus  commencing
          the new year after the long  winter night in  the  Arctic  region.   The
          simultaneous  chararter of the motion of waters,  the commencement  of
          the  new  year,  and  the  winning  of  light  after  T1shtrya's  fight  with
          Apaosha,  can be explained  only in  this  way,  and  not  by  making  the
          legend refer to the rainy season (see  the discussion about 'waters' in the
          next chapter). The Pairika Duz-Yai1'}'a, or the Bad Year, which  Tish try a
          is said  to break asunder, is,  on  this  theory,  the  wearisome dark ArctiC
          night.
   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405