Page 462 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 462

VEDIC  MYTHS--THE  MATUTINAL  DEITIES       243
          struggle  with  the  ten-fold  division  of  darkness-Bribaspati  and  his
          lost  wife  in  the  ~ig-Veda-Ten  non-sacrificing  kings  and  Ravana
          compared-Mythical  element in  the  R4mayana probably  derived  from
          the Vedic mytholgy-Hanumln and Vri1hlkapi-Was  Rlmlyana  copied
          from  Homer-Both may have a  common source-Conclusion.

              THE  inadequacy  of the  Storm  theory  to  explain  the  legend
          of Indra and V{itra has been fully set forth in the last chapter; and
          we  have  seen  how  a  number  of points  therein,  hitherto  uninte-
          lligible,  can be explained by the Arctic theory  combined  with  the
          true conception of the circulation of aerial waters in the upper and
          the nether world. We shall now take up the  legends  that  are  usu-
          ally explained on the Vernal theory, and show how, like the Storm
          theory, it fails  to account satisfactorily for the different features  of
          these legends.  Such legends  are to be found  amongst the achieve-
          ments  of the  Ashvins,  the  physicians  of the  gods.  These  achieve-
          ments are summed up, as it were, in certain hymns of the  ~ig-Veqa
          (I, 112,  116,  117,  118 ), each of which briefly refers to the import-
          ant exploits of these twin gods. As in the case ofV#tra, the character
          of the Ashvins and their exploits are explained by different schools
          of interpreters in different ways. Thus Yaska ( Nir. XII, 1 ) informs
          us  that  the  two  Ashvins  are  regarded  by  some  as  representing
          Heaven and Earth, by others as Day and Night, or as Sun and Moon;
          while the Aitihasikas  take them  to  be two  anc~ent kings,  the  per-
          formers  of holy  acts.  But as  before,  we  propose  to  examine  the
          legends  connected with the Ashvins  only  according to the  natur~;t­
          listic or the Nairukta school of interpretation. Even in this scho_ol
          there are, however,  a number of different views held regarding the
          ~ture and the  character of these two gods. Some believe _that  the
          natural basis of the Ashvins must be the morriiag star, that being
          the  only  morning-light  visible  before  fire,  da~n an~ sun;  while
          others think that the two sta;s in the constellation of Gemini w~e
          the  original representatives  of the twin gods.  The  achievemen~ 9f
          these  gods  are,  however,  generally  explained  as  referring  to  the
          restoration  of the  powers  of the  sun decayed  in  wint~r;  and  an
          elaborate discussion  of the  Ashvins'  exploits  ~n this  theory  will
          be  found in the  Contributions  to  the  Science  of Mythology,  ( V Cll·
          II, pp. 583-605) by Prof. Max. Muller, published a few  ye~s agt>.
          It is  beyond  the  scope  of this  work  to· examine· each  oncbdf·.tbe
          different legends connected with the Ashvins~ ~s Prof.· M~2t ,MyUtr
   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467