Page 467 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 467

248         SAMAGRA  TiiAK - 2  IIIIi · THE  ARCilC  HOME
           these legends are explained by the Vernal theory as it is at present
           understood. Thus we cannot explain why the proteges of the Ashvins
           are described  as  being delivered from  darkness  on the theory that
           every  affliction  or distress  mentioned in  the legend refers  to mere
           decrease  of the power of the sun in winter.  Darkness is  distinctly
           referred  to  when  the treasure  dug  up for Vandana is compared to
           the" sun dwelling in darkness " (I, 117, 5 ) , or when Bhujyu is said
           to have: been  plunged in waters and sunk in bottomless  darknes~
           ( anarambhlll)e  tamasi ),  or when Atri is  said to have been deliver-
           ed from  darkness  ( tamas) in  VI,  50,  10.  The powers  of the  suri
           are  no  doubt  decayed  in  winter,  and  one  can  easily  understand
           why  the  sun  in  winter  should  be  called  lame,  old  or  distressed;
            But blindness naturally means  darkness  or  tamas  ( I, 117,  17 ) ;
           and  when  express  references  to  darkness  ( tamas )  are  found  i.ri.
           several  passages,  we  cannot  legitimately  hold  that  the  story  of
           curing  the  blind  refers  to  the  restoration  of the  decayed  powers
           of the  winter  sun.  The  darkness  referred  to is  obviously  the  real
           darkness  of the  night;  and  on  the  theory  of the  daily  struggle
           between  light  and  darkness  we  shall  have  to  suppose  that  these
            wonders  were  achieved  every  day.  But  as  a  matter  of fact  they
           are not said to  be performed every day,  and Vedic scholars have
                                                                    1
            therefore,  tried to explain the legends  on the theory of the yearly
           exile  of  the  sun  in winter.  But we now see that in the latter case
           references  to  blindness  or  darkness  remain  unintelligible; · and
            as  the  darkness  is  often  said  to  be  of several  days'  duration,  we
           are  obliged  to  infer  that  the  legends  refer  to the }ong  yearly
           darkness,  or,  in  other  words,  they  have  for  their  physical  basis
           the  disappearance  of the  sun below  the  horizon during the long
            night of the  Arctic  region.             ·
               The  Vernal  theory cannot again explain  the  different  periods
           of time  during  which  the  distress  experienced  by  the · Ashvins•
           proteges  is  said  to have lasted. Thus Rebha, who was  overwhelm-
           ed  in  waters,  is  said  to  have  remained  there for  ten nights and
           nine  days (I, 116, 24) while Bhujyu,  another worshipper oftheirst
           is  described  as  having  been  saved  from  being  drowned  in  the
           bottomless sea or darkness, where he lay for three days  and three
           nights  ( I,  116, 4).  In VIII,  5,  8,  the  Ashvins  are  again  described
           as  having  been  in  the  ptiravat  or  distant  region  for  three  days
           and  three  nights.  Prof.  Max  Muller,  agreeing  with  Benfey
           takes  this  period,  whether  of ten  or  three  days_. as  representing
   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472