Page 474 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 474

VEDIC  MYTHS-THE MATUTINAl. DEITIES       255
          so may your· embryo ( garbha ) move ( in your womb ),  and come
          out  after  being  developed  for  ten  months  ( dashamdsya~)"
              "  8.  Just as the wind, just as the forest, just as the sea moves,
          so  0  ten-monthed  (embryo) l  come  out  with  the  outer  cover,
          (jarayu )."
              "9. May the child ( kumara ), lying in the mother's (womb)
          for  ten  months,  come  out  alive  and  unhurt,  alive  for  the  living
          mother."
              These  three  verses,  as  observed  above,  immediately  follow
          the  verses  where  the  wooden  case  is  said  to  be  shut  and  opened
          for  Saptavadhri,  and  naturally  they  must  be  taken  to  refer  to,
          or  rather  as  forming  a  part of the  same  legend.  But  neither  the
          Vernal  nor  the  Dawn  theory  supplies  us  with  any  clue  whatso-
          ever  to  the  right  interpretation  of these  verses.  The  words  used
          present  no  difficulty.  A  child  full-grown  in  the  womb  for  ten
          months  is  evidently  intended,  and its  safe  delivery  is  prayed for.
          But  what  could  this  child  be  ?  The  wife  of the  eunuch  Vadhri-
          mati  is  already  said  to  have  got  a  child  Hira~ya-hasta through
          the  favour  of  the  Ashvins.  We  cannot,  therefore,  suppose  that
          she  prayed for  the  safe  delivery  of a  child,  nor  can  Saptavadhri
          be said to have prayed for the safe delivery of his wife,  who never
          bore  a  child  to  him.  The  verses,  or rather  their  connection  with
          the  story  of Saptavadhri told in the first  six  verses  of the  hymn,
          have,  therefore;  remained  unexplained  up-to  the  present  day,
          the  only  explanations  hitherto  offered  being,  as  observed  above,
          either  utterly  unsatisfactory  or rather  no  explanations  at  all.
              The  whole  mystery  is,  however,  cleared  up  by  the  light
          thrown upon the legend  by  the Arctic theory.  The dawn is  some-
          times  spoken of in the  ~ig-Veda as  producing the sun ( I;  113,  1 ;
          VII,  78,  3 ).  But  this  dawn  cannot  be  said  to  have  borne  the
          child  for  ten  months;  nor  can we  suppose  that  the  word  dasha-
          masya!z  ( of ten months ),  which  is  found  in  the  7th and the  8th
          and the  phrase  dasha  masan  found  in  the  9th verse  of the  hymn
          were  used  without  any  specific  meaning  or intention.  We  must,
          therefore,  look  for  some  other  explanation,  and  this  is  supplied
          by  the  fact  that  the  sun  is  said  to  be  pre-eminently  the  son  of
          Dyava  prithivi,  or  simply  of Dyu in the  Rig-Veda.  Thus  in  X,
          37,  1,  the  sun  is  called  divas-putra  or  the  son  of Dyu,  and in  I,
          164,  33,  we  read,  "  Dyu is  the father,  who  begot  us,  our origin
          is  there,  this  gieat  Earth  is  our  parent  mother.  The  father  laid
   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479