Page 514 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 514

THE  A VESTIC  EVIDENCE            295
              The  old  Persian  and  Greek  names  in  the  above  table  are
          taken  from  the  inscriptions  of the  Achremenian  kings  and  the
          works  of Greek  writers  after  the  overthrow  of the  Achremenian
          dynasty  by  Alexander  the  Great.  They  show  that  at  least  10
          out of 16  lands  can  be  still  indentified  with  certainty;  and if so
          we  can  safely  say  that  the  account  in  the  first  Fargard  is  real
          and  not  mythical.  But  with  regard  to  the  land  mentioned  first
          in the  list,  there  has  been  a  difference  of opinion  amongst  Zend
          scholars.  The  Airyana  Va~jo is  the  first  created  happy  land,
          and  the  name  signifies  that  it  was  the  birthland  ( Va~jo =seed,
          Sans.  bija )  of the  Aryans  ( Iranians ),  or  the  Paradise  of the
          Iranian  race.  Was  this  a  mythical  region  or  a  real  country
          representing  the  original  home  of the  Aryans,  and  if it  was  a
          real  country  where  was  it  situated  ?  This  is  the  first  question
          which  we  have  to  answer  from  the  evidence  contained  in  the
          first  two  Fargards  of the  Vendidad;  and  secondly,  we  have  to
          decide  whether  the  sixteen  lands  mentioned  above  were  the
          successive  countries  occupied  by  the  ancestors  of  the  Iranian
          race  in  their  migrations  from  the  original  home  in  the  north.
          The  Fargard  says  nothing  about  migration.  It simply  mentions
          that so  many  lands  were  created  by  Ahura  Mazda  and  that in
          opposition  thereto  Angra  Mainyu,  the  evil  Spirit  of the  Avesta,
          created  so  many  different  evils  and  plagues  which  rendered  the
          lands  unfit  for  human  residence.  It is  inferred  from  this  that
          the  Fargard  does  not  contain  an account  of  successive  migra·
          tions  but  merely  gives  us  a  description  of the  countries  known
          to  the  ancestors  of the  Iranians  at the  time  when  the  Fargards
          were  composed.  In  other  words,  the  chapter  is· geographical
          and  not  historical,  containing  nothing  but  a  specification  of
          the  countries  known  to  the  Iranians  at  a  particular  time;  and
          ij is  argued  that  it  would  be  converting  geography  into  history
           to  take  the  different  countries  to  represent  the  successive  stages
           of migrations  from  the  primeval  home,  when  not  a  word  about
           migration  is  found  in  the  original  text.  Professor  Darmesteter
           further  observes  that  as  the  enumeration  of the  sixteen  lands
           begins  with  Airyana  Va~jo  by  the  river  Vanguhi  Daitya  and
           ends  with  Rangha,  which  corresponds  with  the  Vedic  Rasa,  a
           mythical  river  that  divides  the  gods  from  the  fiends,  and  that
           as  the  Vanguhi  and  the  Rangha  were  originally  the  celestial
           rivers  that  came  down  from  heaven  ( like  the  two  heavenly
   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519