Page 516 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 516

THE  A VESTIC  EVIDENCE            297
          Va~jo. "  but it is doubtful if" daitya "  denotes a river in this place.
         The  Zend  phrase  Airyanem  Vaejo  vanghuyao  daityayo,  which
         Darmesteter  translates  as  "  the  Airyana  Vaejo,  by  the  good
          ( vanghuhi ) river Daitya, " is understood by  Spiegel to mean "  the
         Airyana  Vaejo  of  the  good  creation,"  while  Haug takes  it  as
          equivalent  to  "the  Airyana  Va~jo  of  good  capability. "  It
         is,  therefore,  doubtful  if the  Daitya  river  is  mentioned  along
         with  the Airyana Vaejo  in this  passage.  But  even  supposing  that
         Darmesteter's  rendering  is  correct,  he  gives  us  no  authority  for
         indentifying  Daitya  with  Vanguhi.  The  Bundahish  (XX,  7  and
          13) mentions Veh ( Vanguhi) and Daitik ( Daitya) as two distinct
         rivers  though both seem to be located  in  the  Ain1n-vej  ( Airyana
         Vaejo ).  We  cannot again lose  sight  of the fact  that it is  not  the
         Vanguhi ( Veh) alone that flows  through the Airyana Vaejo,  but
         that the Rangha ( Arag ) has the  same  source  and  flows  through
         the same land, viz.,  the Airyana Vaejo. Thus in the very beginning
         of Chapter XX of the Bundahish, we  read that the Arag  and  the
         Veh are the chief of the eighteen rivers, and that they " flow  forth
         from  the  north,  part from  Alburz  and part from  the  Alburz  of
         Ahura-mazd;  one  towards  the  west,  that  is  the  Arag;  and  one
         towards the east, that is the Veh river. "The Bundahish (VII,  15)
         further  informs  us  that  the  Veh  river  flows  out  from  the  same
         source  as  the  Arag  river,  and  Dr.  West  in  a  footnote  observes
         that  both  these  rivers  flow  out from  "  the  north  side  of the
         ArMvivstlr  ( Ardvi  Sura  Anahita )  fountain  of the  sea,  which  is
         said  to be  on the lofty Hugar ( Hukairya ),  a  portion  of Algurz.
         Even  according  to  Bundahish,  the  Vanguhi  is,  therefore,  the
         eastern  and  the  Rangha  the  western  river,  in  the  nothern
         part  of Alburz;  or  in  other  words,  they  represent  two  rivers  in
         a  country,  situated  in  the  north,  one  flowing  towards  the  east,
         and one to the west, in that region.  It would, therefore, be, to say
         the least, unsafe to infer from this that the Airyana Vaejo represents
         the  easternmost  country,  because  the  name  Veh  or  Vanguhi
         was  in later  times  attached  to  the easternmost river  in Iran.  For
         by  parity  of reasoning,  we  can  as  well  place  the  Airyan  Vaejo
         in  the  far  west,  in as  much  as  the  name  Arag  or  Rangha  was
         given, as stated by Darmesteter himself, in later times to the west-
         ernmost river.              '
             It is  again  a  question  why  Rangha should  be identified  with
         the  Caspian  Sea,  or  some  western  river  in  Iran.  The  Fargard
   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521