Page 526 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 526

TilE  A VESTIC  EVIDENCE           307

          a  conclusion well  in keeping with  the ancient Roman  year  of ten
          months.  But  apart  from  this  suggestion,  there  is  a  striking
          coincidence  between  the  Vedic  and  the  A vestic  tradition in this
          respect.  According  to  the  Bundahish  (XXV, 20 ),  the  year  is
          divided  into  four  seasons  of  three  months  each,  Farvar~in,
          Ar~avahisht  and  Horvadad  constituting  the  season  of  the
          spring;  Ttr,  AmerOda~ and  Shatvairi'>  the  summer;  Mitro,  Avan
          and  Atrao  the  autumn;  and  Din,  Vohiiman  and  Spendarma~,
          the  winter.  The fortieth  day  of Sharad  or  autumn would,  there-
          fore,  represent  the  tenth  day  ( Aban)  of A van;  and  the  Vedic
          statement  discussed  in  the  ninth  chapter,  that  Indra's  fight  with
          Shambara  commenced  "on the  fortieth  day  of Sharad"  agrees
          well  ( only  with  a  difference  of ten  days )  with  the  statement  in
          the  Bundahish  that  the  winter  in  the  Airyana  Va~jo commenced
                            "
          with the month of Avan  the second month in  autumn.  We  have
          thus  a  very  close  resemblance  between  the  Vedic  and  the
          A vestic  tradition about the end of summer in the  original Arctic
          home;  and  the  corresponding  Roman  and  Greek  traditions  have
          been  previously  noticed.  In  short,  a  year  of  seven  or  ten
           nonths sun-shine can be traced  since its  double character can be
          explained  only  by  placing  the original  home in  the  circum-polar
          regions,  we  are inevitably led  to  the conclusion that the Airyana
          Vaejo  must  also  be  placed  in  the  same  region.  The  Avestic
          account  is  by  itself  plain  and  intelligible, and  the  apparent
          inconsistencies  would  have  been  explained  in  a  natural  way
          long ago, if Zend scholars had not created unnecessary difficulties
          by transferring the site  of this Paradise to  the east of the  ancient
          Iran.  Under  these  circumstances  it  is  needless  to  say  which  of
          the  two  theories  regarding  the  position  of the  Airyana Vaejo is
          correct, for no one would accept a hypothesis which only enhances
          the  confusion,  in  preference  to  one  which  explains  everything  in
          a  natural and satisfactory manner.                ·
              We  have  so  far  discussed  the  passage  in  the  first  Fargard
          which  describes  the  climate  of the  Airyana  Vaejo.  The  passage,
          even when taken by itself, is quite intelligible on the Arctic theory;
           but in ascertaining  the  original  climate  of the Airyana  Vaejo  we
           supposed  that  it  was  the  reverse  of the  one  introduced  by  the
           invasion of Angra Mainyu.  The  second  Fargard of the Vendidad
           which  is  similar  in  character  to  the  first  contains,  however,  a
           passage,  which  does  away  with  the  necessity  of  such  assump-
   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531