Page 582 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 582

PRIMITIVE  ARYAN  CULTURE  AND  RELIGION   363
            into  Europe  from  other  countries  either  by  commerce  or  by  the
            Indo-European  race  going  there  from  outside,  and  the  theory  of
            the  Arctic  home  with  its  inter-Glacial  civilisation  lends  support
            to  this  view.  I  might  in  passing  here  refer  to  an  instance  which
            illustrates  the  danger  of  relying  exclusively  on  Comparative
            Philology  in  this  respect.  Dr.  Schnider  has  shown  that  copper,
            at any  rate,  was  known  to  the  primitive  Aryans;  and he  admits
            the  possibility  that  this  metal  may,  in  isolated  cases,  have  been
            employed  in  the  t;nanufacture  of weapons  like  fighting  knives  or
            lanceheads.  But  we  are  told  that  there  are  linguistic  difficulties
            which  prevent us from assuming that gold and silver were  known
            in the  primitive  period.  On an examination  of the  subject it will,
            however,  be  seen that in cases like  these  the  philologist relies  too
            much  on  his  own  methods  or  follows  them  too  rigidly.  For
            instance khalkos ( copper or bronze ) is mentioned by Homer as  a
            medium  of exchange  ( II, vii,  472 ) ;  and  Comparative  Philology
            discloses  two  etymological  equations,  one  derived  from  the  root
            * mei ( Sans. me) denoting '  barter, '  and the  other derived  from
            the  Sanskrit  kri,  Greek  priamai,  meaning  purchase.  The  ~ig­
            Veda  ( VIII,  I,  5 )  also  mentions  a  measure  of the  value  called
            shulka,  and,  as  the  word  is  used  in  later  Sanskrit  literature  to
            denote  a  small  payment  made  at  a  toll-house,  it  is  not  unlikely
            that  shulka  originally  meant  a  small  coin  of copper  or  bronze
            similar  in  character  to  the  khalkos  mentioned  by  Homer.  Now
            it is  true  that ordinarily Greek kh, is  represented by h in Sanskrit,
            and that if thi; rule be rigidly applied to  the present case it would
            not  be  possible  to  phonetically  identify  khalkos  with  shulka.
            Philologists  have,  therefore,  tried  to  compare  khalkos  with
            Sanskrit  hr£ku  or  hfku.  But,  as  remarked  by  Dr.  Schrader,  the
            connection  seems  to  be  altogether  improbable.  Hr£ku  is  not  a
            Vedic  word,  nor  does  it  mean  copper  or  bronze.  Despite  the
            phonetic difficulty,- and the difficulty is not so  serious as it seems
            to be at the first sight, for Sanskrit sh is represented by k  in Greek,
            and  this  k  sometimes  gives  place  to  the  aspirated  kh,- I  am,
            therefore,  inclined  to  identify  khalkos  with  shulka,  and  if this  is
            correct,  we  must  conclude  that  undivided  Aryans  were  familiar
            with some metal, either copper or bronze, as a medium of exchange.
            There are many other points similar in character. But it is impossible
            to go  further into  this  subject in  this  place.  I  only  want  to point
            out the  reservation  with  which  we  shall  have  now  to  accept  the
   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587