Page 586 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 586

PRIMITIVE  ARYAN  CULTURE  AND  RELIGION   367
           themselves  are  naturally  the  best  evidence  on  the  point.  But,  as
           shewn  by  Dr.  Muir  in  the  second  chapter  (pp.  218-86)  of the
           volume  above  mentioned,  the  utterances  of  the  Vedic  J;H~his on
           this point are not  unanimous. Thus  side  by  side  with passages in
           which  the  Vedic  bards  have  expressed  their  emotions,  hopes  or
           fears,  or  prayed  for  worldly  comforts  and  victory  over  their
           enemies,  condemning  evil  practices  like  gambling  with  dice
           ( X, 34 ), or have described events, which on their face  seem to be
           the  events  of the  day;  side  by  side  with  passages  where  the  poet
           says  that he has made ( Kr£), generated (jan), or fabricated ( tak~h)
           a  new  ( navyas£  or  apurvya )  hymn,  much  in  the  same  way  as
           carpenter fashions  a  chariot  (I,  47,  2;  62,  I3;  II, 19,  8;  IV,  16,
           20; VIII, 95, 5; X, 23, 6; 39,  14; 54, 6; I60, 5; etc.); or with hymn,
           in which we  are plainly told that they are composed by  so and so,
           the  son  of so  and so,  (I, 60,  5;  X,  63,  17;  67,  I; etc.),  there  are
           to  be  found  in  the  ~ig-Veda itself  an  equally  large  number  of
           hymns  where  the  ~i~his  state  in  unmistakable  terms  that  the
           hymns  sung  by  them  were  the  results  of inspiration  from  Indra,
           Varupa,  Soma,  Aditi  or  some  other  deity;  or  that  the  Vedic
           verses  (richa!z)  directly  emanated  from  the  Supreme  Puru~ha,
           or  some  other  divine  source;  or  that  they  were  given  by  gods
           ( devatta ),  or  generated  by  them  and  only  seen  or  perceived
           (pashydt) by the poets in later  times, (I, 37,  4; II, 23,  2; VII, 66,
           II; VIIJ,  59,  6; X, 72,  1; 88,  8; 90, 9; etc.).  We  are also  told that
           Vach  (speech) is  nitya or eternal  (VIII, 75, 6,  also  cf.  X,  I26); or
           that the gods generated the divine Vach and also the hymns (VIII,
           I 00,  11 ;  I 0 I,  16; X,  88,  8). The evidence  of the Vedic hymns does
           not,  therefore,  enable  us  to  decide  the  question  one  way  or  the
           other;  but  if the  composition  of the  hymns  is  once  ascribed  to
           human effort, and once to divine inspiration or to the gods directly,
           it is clear that at least some of these old  ~i~his believed the hymns
           to  have  been  sung  under  inspiration  or  generated  directly  by
           the  goddess  of  speech  or  other  deities.  We  may  reconcile  the
           former  of these views  with the passages  where  the hymns are  said
           to  be  made  by  human  effort,  on  the  supposition  that  the  poets
           who sang the hymns believed themselves to  be acting under divine
           inspiration.  But the explanation fails  to  account for  the  statement
           that  the  ~ik, the  Yajus,  and  the  &lman,  all  emanated  from  the
           Supreme  Purusha  or the  gods;  and  we  must,  therefore,  conclude
           that the  tradition about the eternity  of the Vedas.  or their divine
   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591