Page 569 - Konferensiya to'plami - 1 (ASR)

1. Hemingway's “Hills Like White Elephants”: The story's sparse dialogue and lack
of explicit exposition force readers to infer the central conflict—an unplanned
pregnancy and the couple's differing views on abortion. Hemingway's use of
laconism exemplifies the "Iceberg Theory," where the surface narrative hints at
deeper, unspoken truths. For instance, the repeated phrase "It's perfectly
simple" contrasts with the emotional complexity of the situation, highlighting
the characters' inability to communicate openly.

2. Carver's “Cathedral”: Carver employs laconism to explore themes of isolation
and connection. The narrator's terse descriptions and understated dialogue
convey his initial discomfort with the blind man, Robert. However, the act of
drawing a cathedral together becomes a moment of profound connection
conveyed through simple yet evocative language. Carver's brevity amplifies the
story's emotional weight, allowing readers to feel the narrator's transformation
without overt explanation.
3. Davis's “Break It Down”: Davis's ultra-short story distills the aftermath of a failed
relationship into a few poignant lines. The narrator's attempt to "break down"
the cost of the relationship—both financial and emotional—reveals the futility
of quantifying human experiences. Davis's extreme brevity challenges
traditional narrative structures, forcing readers to confront the raw emotions
underlying the text.
While Hemingway, Carver, and Davis all employ laconism, their approaches
differ in tone and focus: Hemingway uses laconism to explore interpersonal conflict
and unspoken tensions, while Carver focuses on everyday moments, using brevity to
reveal the extraordinary within the ordinary. Davis pushes laconism to its extreme,
crafting stories that are almost aphoristic in their brevity yet rich in emotional and
thematic complexity. These differences highlight the versatility of laconism as a
narrative tool, demonstrating its ability to adapt to various contexts and themes. The
analysis of Hemingway's “Hills Like White Elephants”, Carver's “Cathedral”, and Davis's
“Break It Down” demonstrates that laconism is a powerful narrative strategy that
enhances the emotional and thematic impact of short stories. By relying on brevity,
implication, and reader engagement, these authors create works that are both
concise and deeply resonant. This study contributes to the broader understanding of
laconism and its significance in literature, highlighting its enduring relevance in
contemporary storytelling.

CONCLUSION
The findings of this study underscore the versatility and power of laconism.
Hemingway's use of sparse dialogue and the "Iceberg Theory" reveals the unspoken
tensions between characters, while Carver's understated prose captures the
extraordinary within the ordinary, highlighting moments of human connection.
Davis, on the other hand, pushes laconism to its limits, crafting ultra-short stories that
challenge traditional narrative structures and invite readers to confront raw,
unfiltered emotions. Together, these authors illustrate how laconism can adapt to
different contexts and themes, making it a timeless and universal tool for storytelling.
In conclusion, laconism is more than a stylistic choice; it is a narrative philosophy that
prioritizes precision, economy, and depth. In an age of information overload, the art
of saying more with less resonates deeply, offering readers a space for reflection and 567
connection. As the short story continues to evolve, laconism will undoubtedly remain

III SHO‘BA:

Jahon adabiyotining durdona asarlari tadqiqi va metodologiyasi

https://www.asr-conference.com/