Page 139 - HBR Leader's Handbook: Make an Impact, Inspire Your Organization, and Get to the Next Level
P. 139

128 HBR Leader’s Handbook

           property  and  casualty,  Macia  was  the  only  person  at  XL  who  could  do
           something about them. As a relative newcomer to the company, she was
           also uniquely able to identify them, since they had become part of the land-
           scape over time and therefore were invisible to most of her team.
               The structural issue emerged during Macia’s very first meeting with
           her new direct reports. At the meeting, Macia realized that only two of the
           organization’s eight business leaders (the heads of the property and ca-
           sualty units) were represented at the table. Her other direct reports were
           all leading the company’s support areas such as operations, finance, and
           human resources. “This is upside down,” she recalls thinking. “While sup-
           port functions are important, they aren’t directly accountable for getting
           results.” As she considered the issue further, she recognized that the orga-
           nization’s structure made the staff functions more powerful than the busi-
           ness leaders, so those support functions in effect were making decisions for
           the enterprise instead of enabling profitable growth. More concerning, the
           other business leaders, who oversaw auto, home, commercial, and other
           business units, reported to Macia only through the property and casualty
           heads.  Based  on  this  insight,  Macia  consolidated  the  support  functions
           under  a  newly  created  chief  operating  officer  position  and  elevated  the
           other six business leaders to report directly to her along with the COO, the
           head  of  distribution,  and  the  head  of  underwriting.  This  de-layering
           allowed her to focus more directly on the business leaders and the growth
           plans that they were developing and executing.
               On the underwriting side, Macia also saw a major institutional barrier.
           The underwriting group had excellent technical skills in risk assessment
           and pricing. But Macia saw that the group’s core process was focused in-
           ward: the underwriters waited for coverage proposals to come from bro-
           kers and then evaluated them using their strict technical criteria. Because
           of this process, XL ended up writing a very small percentage of the pro-
           posals that came to it and invested a lot of time assessing and rejecting the
           opportunities that weren’t right for it.
               Macia recognized that there were opportunities to improve this pro-
           cess. She organized a Work-Out session (like the one described in chapter
           3) for underwriters and businesspeople to jointly figure out how to stream-
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144