Page 38 - Report on the infringement of rights and guarantees of attorneys in Ukraine
P. 38

VIOLATION
                          OF THE PRINCIPLES
                          OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS




             CONCEALMENT OF EVIDENCE


             - ignoring by officials  of the requests of attorneys,  provision of answers without the necessary
             information or failure to provide them at all;



                                 For example, the Bar Council of Odesa Region received:
                                 2017 - 97 applications
                                 January-March 2018 - 32 applications 67


             - interference by representatives of the prosecutor’s  office in the examination of evidence, even
             directly at court hearings (prosecutors often insist on considering search records, expert opinions, or
             suggest only examining the text of a bill of indictment).





                                Valentyn Rybin
                                attorney of Yevgenii Mefiodov, one of the participants in the case on the events
                                of 2 May 2014 in Odesa
                       On 6 November 2017, the prosecution in every way possible avoided watching a video,
                       which, according to the prosecutor, was the main evidence of the fault of defendant
                       Yevgenii Mefoidov. Although the attorney stated that the content of the video did not
                       correspond to the description set out in the official expert examination report provided to
                       the court by the prosecutor's office .
                                                         68


                                Kyrylo Lehkykh, Valentyn Rybin
                                attorneys of Oleksandr Shcheholiev, SBU (Security Service of Ukraine) General


                       On 13 November 2017, it became known at the court hearing that one of the main pieces
                       of evidence of the fault of defendant Oleksandr Shcheholiev (order signed by him) was
                       missing in the case file. The attorneys expressed reasonable doubts about the existence of
                       the document, since the prosecutor's office failed to present this evidence to the court in
                       the course  of several years of court  hearings, and only referred  to it in the bill  of
                       indictment .
                                 69


                                Valentyn Rybin
                                attorney of the three-time Taekwondo champion of Ukraine Daria Mastikasheva,
                                accused of treason
                       There have been cases when video materials used previously, for example, videos with
                       the confession of Daria Mastikasheva, were no longer used in the case as soon as the
                       public became aware of the illegal methods used in obtaining such evidence .
                                                                                                  70





             38
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43