Page 55 - rise 2017
P. 55

Comparison between UV LEDs [6] and UV Fluorescent Lamp [6][7]
                                     UV LEDs                   UV Florescent Lamp

             Light         Emit  a  narrow  range  of  UV  light  Emit  a  slightly  broader  range  of  UV
             Emittance     wavelength   but   at   higher  light  wavelength,  but  at  a  lower
                           concentration  and  energy  than  UV  concentration  and  energy  than  UV
                           Fluorescent Lamp             LEDs
             Wavelength                                 Multiple  peaks  (254nm,  313nm,  404
             Characteristic   Single Peak (380nm)       nm, 437nm, and 546nm)
             Power Usage   Less  power  than  UV  Fluorescent  Require more about 110VAC
                           Lamp about 12VDC
             Weight        Lighter  in  weight  UV  Fluorescent  Heavier in weight than LED UV
                           Lamp
             Life          Up to 50,000 hours           About  10,000  hours  of  functional  use
                           (Bulbs are not replace)      (bulbs are replaced every 2 or 3 month
                                                        depending on amount of use)

             Problem Statement
             Most exposure systems used in educational institutions are exposure systems with Fluorescent UV
             lamps  or  Metal  halide  lamps.  Both  systems  are  very  expensive,  too  wide  UV  radiations  and  not
             suitable for the sizes of the PCB to be placed on the equipment. This results in a waste of electricity in
             the exposure system if the PCB is small in size. This UV exposure system only supports a single side
             PCB which has a lot of time to reveal both sides of the PCB. In addition, the timer and buzzer are not
             considered as a requirement of the old design of the exposure system which causes a lot of rough
             estimates during PCB exposure. These problems raise specific questions needed to be objective in
             achieving the goal of this investigation. One major concern that this problem highlighted is the high
             cost of UV exposure system. Given the limitations of the research, this problem poses an investigation
             on how to build a UV exposure system at a minimal cost. Another problem is how the device can help
             minimize  energy  consumption  during  the  PCB  exposure  process.  Other  queries  related  to  the
             performance of the device include how it can support a single and double sided PCB, its ability to
             guarantee the best exposure time, and how devices can warn PCB fabricators when the exposure time
             is over.

             Design and Operation Principle
             As shown in Figure 2, an UV LED exposure device comprises of a housing with a door in which a
             UV  LED  exposure  circuit,  a  controller,  buzzer  and  a  display  unit  are  arranged.  A  glass  plate  is
             arranged inside the housing above the UV LED circuit with an estimated gap, on which a copper plate
             with a transparent film is placed, in such a way that the transparent film is exposed to the UV LED
             radiations  from  the  UV  LED  circuit.  The  copper  plate  is  a  printed  circuit  board  (PCB).  The
             transparent film has an image or a circuit design layout or a pattern. Upon the continuous exposure to
             the UV LED radiation for a certain time period, the circuit design layout is imprinted on the copper
             plate. The exposure time is displayed on the display unit. Upon completion of the exposure time, the
             buzzer produces sound alert.
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60