Page 9 - Insight Issue 1 _ 2018
P. 9

Update from the Deputy Secretary






               Dave Sim looks at some practicalities on the on the
              use of body worn video
                                                                                                      Dave Sim - Deputy Secretary
                                                                                                     Merseyside Police Federation


                The world that we both live and work in is subject   It now follows that when retaining footage from BWV
                  increasing levels of electronic surveillance. In the
              of                                                    for evidential purposes that the offcer should therefore
              Policing world this involves CCTV cameras, Body       view this footage prior to providing a written account,
              Worn Video, IDR and ANPR in police vehicles. This     in order to provide best evidence. Such viewing can
              assists in the prevention and detection of crime,     assist the offcer with a review of what may have been
                                                                    an extremely dynamic situation, with signifcantly stressful
              keeping  both  the  public  and  police  offcers  safer   encounters when use of force may have been considered
              and the means to ensure that vehicles are driven      or indeed used. You should make reference within any
              and insured according to legislative standards.       account that you have taken advantage of the opportunity
                                                                    to review this, prior to completing it. This will prevent an
              There are many advantages to the above technologies   offcer(s) honesty and integrity being called into question
              being utilised in policing, however it does mean that police   when  their written  account  and  the  electronic footage
              offcers need to be aware and adapt to these technologies   may have been contradictory, by lawyers acting for those
              when it comes to providing written accounts for both   that  offcers  deal  with,  the  IOPC  and  PSD. There  does
              evidential and conduct related matters.  When utilising   however  need  to  be  a  recognition  by  those  examining
              Body Worn Video (BWV), Merseyside Police Force policy   our actions in the cold light of day that our memories,
              states that it must be utilised when attending domestic   sight and hearing etc are not a digital recording of any
              related incidents and during stop search, at any other   interaction, the human brain does not act in this manner.
              times the use is discretionary.                       Police Offcers are of course human!

              The use of BWV is ultimately a decision for the offcer,   Of course, offcers are not always directly involved or in
              however use should be the norm when collating evidential   control of the capture of images and recording. It is a
              material and the rationale for not using it may have to be   common occurrence to see members of the public and
              provided. Evidential material is material which is relevant   those that are being dealt with recording police encounters
              to an incident where positive police action has been taken,   on their own mobile phones and devices. Such recordings
              examples include where a crime or incident necessary of   are not always available to offcers prior to providing a
              investigation has been reported, or an arrest has been   written account due to the nature of capture. You may
              made. You could view this as BWV should be used for   wish to use the following where you believe that other
              every arrest, every stop and search, every Police RTC,   forms of electronic recording of incidents may have taken
              every domestic dispute, every search warrant and every   place, such as CCTV, mobile phones, IDR etc that you do
              Section 17, 18 and 32 PACE searches.                  not have the opportunity to review prior to providing an
                                                                    account, within any statement :-
              The use of BWV in this manner has allowed for a
              greater level of successful prosecutions and a reduction   “I have completed the above statement from my honestly
              in both complaints and the time spent on complaints. It   held recollection as to the events described, however I reserve
              demonstrates to both the courts and the likes of the IOPC   the right to comment further should I, at a later time, be
              (Formerly  the  IPCC)  that  offcers  act  in  a  professional   provided with any electronic recording of the events within
              manner  and  the  level  of  both  violence  and  abuse  that   this statement.”
              is  directed  towards  police  offcers  when  dealing  with
              incidents. It could be said that those that may examine
              such evidence are out of touch with the lack of respect for
              offcers and the viewing of BWV brings home clearly to
              them, that offcers act with self-control even when under
              the most challenging of conditions.







              Insight Magazine of Merseyside Police Federation - Issue 1 of 2018    •    www.merpolfed.org.uk        9



         Insight Issue 1 _ 2018.indd   9                                                                           22/03/2018   08:51
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14