Page 205 - J. C. Turner - History and Science of Knots
P. 205

194                     History and Science of Knots

          authors listed knots in order of the magnitude of the curvature or nip, let alone
          measured them, comparing them with measured efficiencies. And I have found
          no description of a break actually occurring at the point of greatest curvature
          or nip within a knot tied in rope. The two Alpine Club Committees [1, 2] said
          that the rope always broke `at the knot'; others [5, p. 17][11, p. 30][16][20,
          p. 243] [23, p. 64] that the break occurred where the rope enters the knot; I
          have not noticed any account of which rope breaks in an unsymmetrical knot
          like a Sheetbend. Ashley [5, p. 17] said that a rope is weakest just outside the
          entrance to a knot, seemingly due to the rigidity of the knot; a knot, he said,
          will be stronger if the nip is well within the structure. Himmelfarb [20, p. 243]
          stated that as tension is applied to it, the rope is compacted, the compression
          prevents internal movement of the fibres and the rope begins to act like a rigid
          bar, and failure occurs where the rope enters the knot. Day [16] speculated
          that the complex stresses and strains that operate in the rope where it enters
          the knot are amplified by the rigidity with which the rope is held in place
          at that point by the knot itself. In his tests on knots tied in gut or nylon
          anglers' lines, Barnes found that the knots tied in gut broke just outside the
          knot proper [7, p. 73], as with the fibre ropes discussed above. But if the knots
          were tied in nylon monofilament, the break tended to be within the knot, at
          the nip [7, p. 69], the place where a particular crossing first makes the knot
          secure. Apparently the slippery surface of the nylon and the reduction of its
          diameter under tension allowed a small fraction of the standing part to be
          drawn out of the knot, the break occurring at the main nip within the knot [7,
          p. 130]. Each knot tested was found to have its own specific point of breaking
          [7, p. 78]. Barnes thought that the loss of strength of the line due to a knot
          depended on how sharply the weakest coil was bent [7, p. 90]. There seems to
          be no consistent explanation of where the break occurs at a knot.


          Creep

          We have all had the experience of tying a rope tightly between two points,
          only to find a while later that the rope has loosened and requires retightening.
          The rope has continued to stretch; this effect is measurable after only a few
          minutes (Table 1). This slow stretch is known as `creep'.
              If a constant load is applied to a rope, such as by suspending a fixed
          weight, the rope continues to stretch slowly and, if the load is a substantial
          fraction of the breaking strength of the rope determined as in the previous
          section, the rope will eventually break. A manila rope given a load of 80-90%
          of its breaking strength, breaks within a few minutes; with a load of 50% of
          the breaking strength, the rope breaks within a few days [20, 24, 25]. Some
          extrapolated figures suggest that, even with a load of 20% of the breaking
          strength (listed as the safe working load for many industrial applications) the
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210