Page 275 - J. C. Turner - History and Science of Knots
P. 275

On Theories of Knots                   265

        what about Linguistic Science--can there be one?
            In the vast new world of Computers, is it only the study of hardware
        systems that constitutes Computer Science? Do the theories of the software
        that drive them not qualify also to be under that umbrella? In the 1960s
        and 1970s a continuous debate raged as to whether the theory and practice of
        Computing could be called Science. Now most Universities in the world have
        Computer Science Departments, even Schools of Computer Science.
            Is Mathematics a Science? That seems harder to decide; if not, what
        about part of it, such as Number Theory? This has been called `the most
        exact Science'; but does it qualify* to be called Number Science? Some would
        have us lump together mathematics, computer science, parts of philosophy
        and the theoretical parts of science and engineering, and place them in a box
       labelled the logical sciences; because, they would claim, they use the method of
       logical deduction from axioms. That is patently wrong; or, at best a half-truth.
       I claim that most new mathematics is arrived at empirically, by mathemati-
       cians `playing with' their materials. They seek and find patterns, which they
       then formulate as theorems (conjectures).  Only after this experimental pro-
       cess do they turn to the (often difficult, sometimes impossible) task of proving
       the theorems, linking them to axioms via previously proved theorems. Any-
       way, not all branches of mathematics, or the other subjects listed, have been
       axiomatised.
           It is evident that there are grey areas, between subjects which are univer-
       sally labelled `Science' (such as Chemistry and Physics) and those which are
       clearly `non-Science' ('Arts' subjects such as Greek and Latin).
           Where does the study of Knots fit into this spectrum? Our next section
       examines this question.


       3. Is there a Science of Knots?
       Under the first definition from the Collins Dictionary, it is impossible to deny
       that the study of knots is a Science. There is a considerable body of knowledge
       on the subject; and that has been organised systematically in a number of
       ways, as we shall show below.
           Under the second definition, however, the evidence has to be looked at
       more closely before arriving at a decision. There is no doubt (in this author's
       mind) that knots are phenomena which make up part of the material and
       physical universe-even though, in order for them to exist, they usually are
       first created by man or woman (they do occur naturally; for example, consider

       `A distinguished mathematician of the last half-century, Freeman Dyson, is on record [3] as
       believing that number theory is applied mathematics. He says: `You are not creating ideas;
       you're just applying methods and using numbers as your experimental material.'
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280