Page 276 - J. C. Turner - History and Science of Knots
P. 276

266                     History and Science of Knots

          the coiled and tangled DNA in all our cell nucleii). And there is ample evi-
          dence that those who construct and study knots make observations, carry out
          experiments, and take measurements of one kind or another. These activities
          may not correspond in kind, physically, with those of Chemists experimenting
          with chemicals* in their laboratories; however, they do embody the spirit and
          practices of `scientific method'.
              The evidence to be presented in this chapter, together with that of most
          other chapters in this book, convince the present author that the Study of
          Knots can be regarded as a Science under the second definition too. Moreover,
          he is satisfied that it qualifies as a Mathematical Science, with at least two
          types and areas of mathematical modelling now available for enlarging its
          study.
              Before relating the above notions on what a Science is to the current states
          of knowledge and theories about knots, we shall briefly trace the history and
          contents of one well-known Science, namely Biology. Comparisons between
          this example and the development and current state of `knot science' will then
          be possible and useful.
              Biology is often known as the Science of Life. It treats generally of the life
          of animals and plants, including their morphology, physiology, origin, devel-
          opment and distribution. It attempts to survey all the phenomena manifested
          by living matter. It would seem that its `universe' is quite clear; and yet, at
          bottom, it is notoriously difficult to distinguish the limit at which an object
          may be said to be `living', rather than `inanimate'. Classification of living
          objects into animals and plants is not always easy, either.
              Granted these shaky foundations of object definition, the saga of the
          development of the biological sciences is a long and exciting one. The study
          of living beings has proceeded unchecked since prehistoric times. Beginning
          with empirical folk-knowledge, collected and handed down orally over many
          hundreds of years, much basic classification would be done as the observations
          were collected. Leaving prehistory behind, and focussing on the development
          of animal science, we can trace knowledge of human and other animal forms,
          and of functions of visceral organs in them, in the records of the Babylonian
          and Egyptian civilizations. In Greece, we find in the fifth century B.C. the
          earliest attempts to organize such knowledge in systematic form. Hippocrates
          (460-377 B.C.) discarded magical theories of disease, and Aristotle (384-322
          B.C.) originated scientific classification. And so on, and on through the many
          centuries up to the present-day, the organised knowledge on life forms has
          accumulated, the literature on it bespattered with great names such as Harvey,

          *Chemistry now has its knot-scientists . In 1989, French chemists synthesised the first knotted
          compound ever made, a 124-atom molecule in the form of a trefoil. More complex knotted
          molecules are now being produced.
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281