Page 1510 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat
P. 1510

67.     FAC was asked to note the changes to the preliminary results which were approved
               by the Chairman prior to the issuing of amended results to candidates.

               68.     FAC ratified and approved the grade changes to the February 2017 results.

               ITEM  4  (iv)  –  REPORT  ON  THE  SUBMISSION  OF  CAPE®  AND  CSEC®  SCHOOL  BASED
               ASSESSMENT

               69.     FAC  received  FAC  2017  (24)  –  Report  on  the  submission  of  CAPE®  School  Based
               Assessment records and samples and was informed that the Local Registrars and Permanent
               Secretaries were notified via email dated 1 March 2017,   of  the  Council’s  rules  and
               regulations with respect to the submission of the candidates’ SBA scores and samples.  The
               submission of SBAs Online, commenced in 2016 on an optional basis, but in 2017 it was
               compulsory  that  all  SBAs  be  submitted  electronically  unless  being  Moderated  onsite  by
                                                                  ®
               externally trained moderators.  In 2017, seven CAPE  subjects were moderated onsite.

               70.     FAC heard that several centres opted to submit Group SBAs, a direction the Council
               formally promoted from 2016.

               71.     FAC was informed that they were 95,072 (95.87%) of the 99,169 registered candidates
               who submitted their SBA scores, compared to 99.58% in 2016. It was noted that there was a
               decrease  by  approximately  6.77%  of  SBA  registration  in  2017  over  2016.    For  2017,  the
               teachers reported that 3,977 (4.01%) of candidates did not submit their SBAs. The table below
               showed slight difference (0.33%) of non-submissions, 4.01% in 2017 compared to 4.34% in
               2016. Notwithstanding, in 2017, 148 (0.15%) a higher percentage compared to 106 (0.10%) in
               2016 were missing their SBA score.

               72.     FAC heard that investigations revealed that 537 (0.56%) candidates would be reported
               ungraded “No SBA Sample Received” an increase over 2016 of (0.30%).

               73.     Table 8 compares the submissions of SBA records and samples over a five-year period.

                                                         Table 8:

                              CAPE® Comparison of SBA Records and Samples for 2013-2017

                         OUTSTANDING SBA RECORDS                           OUTSTANDING SBA
                 YEAR                                                      SAMPLES
                         SBA           NO     % No     SBA       % SBA     #  of            %
                         CANDIDATE  SBA       SBA      Missing  Missing  Candidates         Candidates
                         ENTRIES       Sub.  Sub.                          Not Graded       Not Graded
                                                                           (No Samples)     (No
                                                                                            Samples)
                 2017    95072         3977  4.01      148       0.15      537              0.56
                 2016    101971        4426  4.34      106       0.10      275              0.26
                 2015    99892         4338  4.34      112       0.11      31               0.03
                 2014    98825         4397  4.45      67        0.07      10               0.01
                 2013    93268         3631  3.89      57        0.06      17               0.02


                                                           21
   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515