Page 1166 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat
P. 1166
LEVEL OF ABILITY MARKS ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
- displays an adequate level of musicality in interpreting:
tempo, dynamics and phrasing;
- demonstrates an adequate level of technique and tone
quality; and,
- demonstrates an adequate level of understanding of the
style of the piece.
Limited 4 – 6 In performing a solo item the candidate:
- displays several inaccuracies in rhythm and pitch;
- displays a limited level of musicality in interpreting: tempo,
dynamics and phrasing;
- demonstrates a limited level of technique and poor tone
quality; and, of understanding of the style of the piece.
Very Limited 0 – 3 In performing a solo item the candidate shows any one of the
following:
- displays many inaccuracies in rhythm and pitch;
- displays poor level of musicality in interpreting: tempo,
dynamics and phrasing;
- demonstrates a very limited level of technique and very
poor tone quality; and,
- demonstrates no understanding of the style of the piece.
Scale and Arpeggios/Technical Study (5 marks)
Marks Level of Ability Assessment Criteria
5 Outstanding Very fluent and accurate
4 Good Accurate but could be more fluent
3 Competent Mostly accurate, lacks fluency
2 Moderate Some inaccuracies; lacks fluency
1 Limited Too many inaccuracies
0 Very limited Non-delivery
Viva Voce (Performing) (4 marks)
Marks Rating Assessment Criteria
4 Outstanding Very clear, accurate and convincing commentary on any item
in the file
3 Good Very clear and accurate commentary on any item in the file
2 Competent Clear commentary on any item in the file
1 Limited Weak commentary on any item in the file
0 Very Limited Inadequate commentary on any item in the file
CXC 31/G/SYLL 17 45
