Page 890 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat
P. 890

- 2 -
                                                                                02131032/CAPE/KMS 2017
                                                           LAW
                                                  UNIT 1 Paper 032
                                                KEY AND MARK SCHEME

                                                FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

             Protection of the law

               Referred to as a fair trial or the right to due process
               Regulates the conduct of fair trials
               The emphasis is in criminal trials

             1.     Right to a fair hearing

             “If a person is charged with a criminal offence, then, unless the charge is
             withdrawn, the case shall be afforded a fair hearing” – section 18(1) of the
             Constitution (BDS).

             Maharaj v. Attorney General: person must be given particulars of charge and
             an opportunity to respond to those charges before punishment

             2.     Trial within a reasonable time

             “If a person is charged with a criminal offence, then, unless the charge is
             withdrawn,  the  case  shall  be  afforded  a  fair  hearing,  within  a  reasonable
             time” – section 18(1) of the Constitution (BDS)

             Bell v. DPP – 32 months was an unreasonable time in the appellant’s case,
             which was a retrial.

             3.     Details of offence charged:

             “Every  person  who is  charged  with  a criminal  offence  shall  be  informed  as
             soon as is reasonably practicable, in a language that he understands and in
             details, of the nature of the offence charged” section 8(2) of the Constitution
             (DCA)
             Amerally & Bentham v. R – no offence was disclosed by the charge.

             4.     Legal Representation

             “Every person who is charged with a criminal offence, shall be permitted to
             defend himself in person or by a legal representative of his own choice  –
             section 18(2) of the Constitution (BDS)

             Hinds  v.  AG  of  Barbados:  since  the  appellant  was  represented  on  appeal  he
             could not argue that his right to a fair hearing was breached by the denial
             of legal aid at the trial

             Two points clearly stated in definition                         2 marks
             Three points clearly explained 2 marks each up to   6 marks
             Conclusion                                                      2 marks

             Weak explanation 1 mark each
             Three cases clearly cited 1 mark each                           3 marks
             Coherence                                                       2 marks

                                                                                           Total 15 marks
   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895