Page 965 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat
P. 965

The Panel, in response to these suggestions, carefully examined the topics in the syllabus to ensure
               that they are in keeping with how the construct for Information Technology is defined.

               18.     Ten  (59  per cent)  respondents  agreed that  the  SBA requirements  for  the syllabus  should
               remain the same while seven (41 per cent) respondents indicated that they should not. Two of the
               respondents who indicated that the requirements for the SBA should be changed supported their
               response by citing time as a constraint in completing the SBA, while two respondents suggested that
               Visual Basics for Application (VBA) should not be the only Program option built into the SBA. Similarly,
               the Focus Group raised concerns about the inclusion of VBA as the only programming language. Having
               considered the concerns raised, the Panel took the decision to reintroduce Pascal as another language
               option. Therefore, students have the option of using either VBA or Pascal to complete the SBA task.

               19.     The Focus Group raised concerns about the weighting of Papers 01 and 02 as they felt that
               the proposed weighting could lead to a devaluing and under-testing of Programing and over-testing
               of Productivity Tools. This position was supported by one respondent to the survey who suggested an
               increase to the weighting for Problem Solving and Programming and a decrease to the weighting for
               the Productivity Tools. The Panel considered the suggestions and amended the weighting accordingly.
               The changes to the weighing have been captured in Table 1 below.

                                                         Table 1
                                         Changes to Weighting for Papers 01 and 02

                  PAPER              EXISTING SYLLABUS                      PROPOSED SYLLABUS
                            60 Multiple Choice Items               60 Multiple Choice Items
                              40 items from Sections 1,2 and 3       35 items from Sections 1, 2 and 3
                   PAPER 01     15 items from Sections 4, 5 and 6     15 items from Sections 4, 5 and 6



                            5 items from Sections 7 and 8          10 items from Sections 7 and 8

                            Four Compulsory structured questions   Four compulsory structured questions

                            Theory Profile: 30 marks               Theory Profile: 35 marks
                   PAPER 02   Productivity Tools Profile: 40 marks     Productivity Tools Profile: 30 marks



                            Problem-Solving   and    programming  Problem-Solving    and    programming
                            Profile: 20 marks                      Profile: 25 marks



               Comments from Specialists

               20.      The Assistant Registrar/SCD advised the Panel that the revised draft Information Technology
               Syllabus  was  also  sent  to  Mr  Halzen  Smith,  Assistant  Professor,  Department  of  Computer  and
               Information Sciences, Northern Caribbean University, Jamaica; Dr Wessel Thomas, Principal Lecturer,
               University  of Technology, Jamaica; Dr  Colin  Depradine,  Dean,  Faculty  of  Science  and  Technology,
               University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados; Dr Rene Jordan, Chief Examiner, CAPE® Computer
               Science and Lecturer, Department of Computing and Information Technology, University of the West
               Indies,  St  Augustine,  Trinidad  and  Tobago;  and,  Dr  Ezra  Mugisa,  Senior  Lecturer,  Department  of



                                                            7
   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970