Page 59 - Histories of City and State in the Persian Gulf_Neat
P. 59

Indigenous state traditions and the dialectics of urbanisation  39

            between religion and politics which has been a constant feature of the
            history of Shi‘ism. Through rituals and religious performance ma’tam
            congregations reinforced sectarian bonds among the population irrespec-
            tive of status and socio-economic divisions. They also provided a platform
            for the expression of ill-feeling against the Sunni government. The majlises
            were Sunni institutions which centred on family and kinship. Although
            each household had a majlis as a separate room to entertain visitors, the
            majlises presided over by members of the ruling family, the heads of
            pearling tribes and by the merchant notables of Muharraq and al-Hidd
            were the lifeline of the Dar al-Hukumah. Here the powerful and influen-
            tial negotiated alliances with the Al Khalifah and with their peers and,
            most crucially, attended to the administration of the tribal towns and of
            the agricultural regions they controlled. Moreover, as the institutions which
            regulated tribal affairs, majlises had a strong hierarchical ethos. Leaders
            and merchant patrons of tribal stock received their protégées and interacted
            with them as subordinates, settled internal disputes and in some cases
            dispensed justice. 60
              The strong political profile of the majlises of wealthy Muharraqis with
            connections to the ruling family created a demarcation between public
            and private spaces in their residences. This is suggested by the presence of
            a majlis khususi and majlis ‘umumi: the former used for private audiences
            and for family business, the latter open to visitors. 61  In the houses of the
            sponsors of ma’tam congregations the boundaries between religious,
            domestic and public space were often blurred. The history of the
            ma’tam sponsored by the al-Sabt family in the village of al-Samahij is a
            case in point. Around 1910 the family, whose economic background is
            unclear, built a mosque and started to sponsor ‘ashura’. Typically, the
            congregation which mourned the death of Imam Husayn was first organ-
            ised inside the family residence. Subsequently, villagers collected funds
            for the acquisition of a piece of land adjacent to the house. In the austere
            but allusive words of ‘Abdallah Sayf who collected the oral account in the
            1990s: ‘Hajj ‘Abbas [the builder] from al-Jufayr [a village to the south-east
            of Manama] … built a courtyard in order to transform the land into
            a ma’tam.’ 62  This account rehearses a theme which is familiar in the


            60
              Wali, al-Muharraq, pp. 71, 118–19: Khuri, Tribe and State in Bahrain, pp. 35–6. As venues
              for socialisation and informal politics the majlises of Bahrain were similar to the al-
              diwaniyyat of pre-oil Kuwait.
            61
              Wali, al-Muharraq, pp. 118–19, 142–3. The term al-khususi also defined spaces in the
              house which could not be accessed by visitors.
            62
              ‘Abdallah Sayf, al-Ma’tam fi al-Bahrayn, 2 vols. (Manama: al-Matba‘ah al-Sharqiyyah,
              1995; Maktabah Fakrawi, 2004), vol. I, pp. 348–52 (p. 349, my translation); ‘Abdallah,
              Samahij fi al-tarikh, pp. 76–7.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64