Page 65 - Histories of City and State in the Persian Gulf_Neat
P. 65

The making of Gulf port towns before oil             45

              A useful starting point to discussing the history of Gulf coastal settle-
            ments is to consider the relative influence of indigenous and foreign actors
            in their development. Economically, the port towns of the Gulf were part
            of that regional trading world so evocatively portrayed by Hala Fattah,
                                                                      3
            which included southern Iraq and Iran, and the Arabian Peninsula. As
            nodes of commercial exchange they became the natural focus of tribal and
            imperial competition. While the fortunes of port economies relied on the
            delicate balance between tribal rulers and merchants, the presence of the
            East India Companies since the seventeenth century affected the ability of
            ruling families to use revenue from maritime trade for the purpose of
            political centralisation. Yet regional ports were prone to develop autono-
            mously from the land empires which controlled Iran, Iraq and the Arabian
            Peninsula. In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries the settle-
            ments of the Arab coast, with the notable exception of Basra under
            Ottoman control, became the seats of independent tribal governments:
            the Al Sabah and Al Khalifah principalities based in Kuwait Town,
            Muharraq and Manama; the confederation of city-states controlled by
            the al-Qawasim (sing. al-Qasimi), including Sharjah and Ras al-
            Khaymah; and the Al Bu Falasah and the Banu Yas principalities based
            in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Until the mid nineteenth century, the ports of
            southern Iran also prospered under Arab families of tribal descent which
            succeeded in keeping the Qajar government at arm’s length.
              Reflecting a long history of empire by proxy, the commercial and
            political encroachment of Europe in the Persian Gulf did not affect sub-
            stantially the spatial and socio-political organisation of its port towns.
            Coastal settlements remained essentially ‘native’ towns untouched by
            the transformative powers of foreign military outposts and colonies of
            settlement. In Indonesian ports, in contrast, the Dutch East India
            Company enforced an elaborate system of administration and the segre-
                                                           4
            gation of native populations from Company employees. Since European
            trading stations made their appearance in the Persian Gulf in the seven-
            teenth century, the bulk of foreign trade continued to be conducted by
            local intermediaries and by transient foreign merchants, soldiers and
            administrators. Ottoman Basra, for instance, had large numbers of
            Greek, Italian, Dutch and English traders. In the same way as Manama,
            patterns of residential settlement suggest that it developed as an open port



            3
             Fattah, The Politics of Regional Trade.
            4
             See for instance the case of colonial Makassar. H. Sutherland, ‘Eastern Emporium and
             Company Town: Trade and Society in Eighteenth-Century Makassar’ in F. Broeze (ed.),
                                                 th
                                             th
             Brides of the Sea: Port Cities of Asia from the 16 –20 Centuries (Kensington: New South
             Wales University Press, 1989), pp. 97–128.
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70