Page 199 - Arabia the Gulf and the West
P. 199

196                            Arabia, the Gulf and the West



                            functionaries, receive the highest emoluments, though their contribution to
                            the general economic welfare is of questionable value. At the bottom of the
                            financial scale is the mass of Persian, Baluchi, Omani and Yemeni labourers

                            who do the hardest work and receive the lowest pay. A labourer’s basic daily
                            wage in Abu Dhabi in the spring of 1976 was 23 dirhams (about £3). For a
                            six-day working week, therefore, he received lift dirhams, or about £18, which
                            came to something less than 600dirhams, or under £80, a month. To emphasize
                            - if emphasis is necessary - the meagreness of this payment, it might be pointed
                            out that, as an inducement to the native tribesmen to send their children to the

                            schools provided for them, the Abu Dhabi government paid parents the sum of
                            500 dirhams a month for every child who attended a secondary school, and the
                            children themselves received from the government a further too or zoodirhams
                            a month as pocket money.

                               The familiar argument put forward in defence of the exploitation of foreign
                            labour in the Gulf oil states is that the labourers earn far more than they would
                            in their own countries, and that it was the very impoverishment of their lives at
                            home that drove them to find work abroad. Hence the swarms of labourers who
                            beat on the doors of the oil states, clamouring to be admitted, and hence, too,
                            the large numbers of illegal immigrants who are willing to run all manner of

                            risks to enter by surreptitious means. There is enough truth in the argument to
                            accord it a hearing, though it is a sorry justification for some of the circum­
                            stances in which Uitlander labourers are recruited and made to work. Some of
                            the worst abuses arise from the muqaddam system, which has for a good two
                            centuries or more operated around the shores of the Red Sea and the Gulf.

                            Essentially it is a system of indentured labour. A muqaddam is a broker, a
                            contractor of labour who will for a fee engage to supply a given number of men
                            to work for a specified period of time or until the completion of a project. He is
                            paid both by the employer on aper capita basis and by the labourer he recruits.
                            A thriving business is done in the illegal sale of work permits. If a labourer
                            cannot afford the bribe required to obtain a permit at the start of his contract,

                            he may arrange to pay the bribe in instalments as he works; and the bribe is
                            invariably large enough to ensure that he works for a good length of time. As
                            the muqaddam usually operates hand in glove with the shipowners who trans­
                            port the labourers from the Indian sub-continent to the Red Sea and the Gul ,

                            there are further opportunities for profit in the advancing and repayment 0
                            passage money. For all practical purposes, the labourer never fully escap£"J1 e
                            clutches of the muqaddam throughout the length of his contract. Muqa cmis
                            are also given to squeezing the employer to whom they have contracte to
                            supply men. At one stage or another, usually a critical one, in the construcuon
                            of a project, a muqaddam will demand a higher fee for the continue pr°vis*

                            of labour, usually citing as an excuse some wholly imaginary prob em t a
                           arisen in the supply of labour from Pakistan, India or Persia. AH t0° c°ns“
                           of his own contractual obligations and the risk of financial Pena
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204