Page 32 - Arabia the Gulf and the West
P. 32

The Abandonment of Aden                             23


       armed struggle, in accordance with the acknowledged canons of the anti­
       colonialist movement. From a practical viewpoint, too, harassment of the
       British was necessary to secure the continuance of Cairo’s support in money
       and propaganda.
          To some extent Asnaj and the PSP were driven to resort to greater violence
       by their need to compete with the National Liberation Front for the allegiance
       of the Aden ‘street’. The N LF had instituted a campaign of terrorism in Aden
       in August 1964, and in the next twelve months it made considerable headway
       in recruiting followers not only among the labourers and artisans of the trade
       unions but also from the ranks of government servants, police, schoolteachers,
       office clerks and skilled tradesmen. Much of the NLF’s appeal lay in its
       espousal and propagation of socialist beliefs, its insistence that the nationalist
       revolution to expel the British was only part of a wider social revolution which
        would destroy the power of the traditional ruling and merchant classes and
        pave the way for the emergence of the proletarian state. Whether the labourers
        from the protectorates who composed the NLF’s principal constituency really
       appreciated the dialectical subtleties being strewn before them is highly doubt­
        ful; but they grasped only too well the opportunities for booty and blood­
       letting being offered them, and this was enough to win their allegiance.
          The strongly revolutionary content of the NLF’s propaganda in Aden was
        evidence of a growing rift in its leadership, which in turn was a reflection of the
        pressures being exerted upon it from several directions, not least from oppos­
       ing factions within the Arab Nationalists’ Movement. As has already been
        indicated, a conflict had been building up for some time within the movement
        between those who wanted to keep it an elite group, philosophically wedded to
        Nasserism, and those who, increasingly influenced by Marxist doctrines,
        wanted to seek mass support so as to accomplish a sweeping social revolution as
        well as the destruction of Israel and the elimination of Western influence from
        the Middle East. At a full-scale conference of the ANM in Beirut in May 1964,
        to which the N LF sent four delegates led by Qahtan al-Shaabi, the quarrel was
        brought into the open. Qahtan al-Shaabi’s group sided with the Nasserist
        faction led by Habash, Haddad and al-Hindi, against the Marxist faction led by
        Muhsin Ibrahim and Hawatima, as much out of a concern to demonstrate their
        adherence to Nasserism and Nasser, who was, after all, the source of arms and
        funds for their struggle in South Arabia, as out of personal or political convic­
        tion. The NLF cells active in Aden and the protectorates, however, inclined
        the other way, towards the radical wing of the ANM, and the difference in
        outlook was made apparent at the first congress of the NLF held at Taiz in the
        Yemen in June 1965. Although the politburo set up by the congress to direct
        the NLF’s campaign was dominated by Qahtan al-Shaabi and the Nasserite
        group, the political manifesto that was adopted reflected the influence of the
        NLF radicals. It declared, in the indigestible prose characteristic of such
        crypto-Marxist pronunciamentos:
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37