Page 76 - Arabia the Gulf and the West
P. 76

The Retreat from the Gulf                                         13


            Shaikh Yusuf Yasin - who was also Saudi Arabia’s representative on the inter­

            national arbitration tribunal. Much of the bribery and some of the other louche
            activities had as their object the manufacture of evidence for incorporation in
            the memorial which the Saudi government intended to submit to the tribunal
            in support of its case. Although the memorial was compiled in the main by

            American advisers not wholly unconnected with the Arabian research division
            of ARAMCO, the Saudis were uneasy about entrusting their chances of
            success solely to the skill and inventiveness of their advisers. So in Geneva in
            September 1955 they took the logical step of trying to bribe two of the members
            of the tribunal itself. At this the British member resigned, and his example was
            followed by the tribunal’s president, a distinguished Belgian jurist and former

            judge of the International Court of Justice. A month later, on 26 October, the
            British government informed the Saudi government that it considered the
            arbitration to have been wrecked by the Saudis’ behaviour. Henceforth, it
            added, it would regard the Riyad Line of 1935, subject to a couple of minor

            modifications, as the frontier between Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi. That
            same day Abu Dhabi and Omani tribesmen, supported by the Trucial Oman
            Levies, expelled the Saudi police force from the Buraimi oasis. A substantial
            sum of money found in the police post was returned to the Saudi government
            with the comment that, as it seemed an unduly large amount for the upkeep of
            fifteen men, it could only have been intended for illicit purposes. The Saudis

            accepted the money but rejected the accusation. ‘It is not part of the traditions
            of the Saudi Arabian government’, they asserted, ‘to make colonies of nations,
            whether by force or by buying their loyalties with bribes.’
               A year later, at the time of the Suez crisis, the Saudis broke off diplomatic
            relations with Britain. They offered several times in the next few years to

            reopen relations in exchange for a substantial concession on the frontier issue.
            Each time they were told that this was not possible. ‘We cannot consider
            “buying back” ... our diplomatic relations’, the Foreign Office stated publicly
            in July 1959, ‘by making concessions at other people’s expense.’ Diplomatic
            relations were eventually resumed in January 1963, when it was agreed to
            resume discussion of the Buraimi question under the supervision of the UN

            secretary-general, acting in his personal capacity. Little progress was made,
            not least because the Saudis kept insisting, as they had since October 1955, that
            the arbitration was still in force. Oil had been discovered in Abu Dhabi
            territory in i960 - the Murban field in the northern quarter of the Dhafrah -

            and production began a couple of years later. It had the effect of intensifying
            the Saudi government’s protests, which had been going on at intervals since
             1955, against the operations of the Abu Dhabi Petroleum Company (as the Abu
            Dhabi division of the IPC subsidiary, Petroleum Concessions Limited,
            was now called), on the grounds that ADPC was violating Saudi territory,
            appropriating Saudi oil and contravening the arbitration agreement of
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81