Page 249 - Gulf Precis(II)_Neat
P. 249

Part VI—Chap. XLV.            227

           from Egyptian captivity. The Nejdeans flocked to thostandard of thorightful
           Prince, and in June 1843 Abdullah-bin-Suncyan was forced to surrender at
           discretion.
               413.  In July 1843 Feysal sent a messongor with letters to tho maritime
           and inland Sheikhs of Oman, intimating his intention of sending an army
           under Syud bin Mutluk, on tho termination of the hot weather, for tho
           purpose of bringing that provinco under bis authority. In consequence of
            this throat the Chiefs of tho inland fort of Bcroymah applied for tho aid of
           tho British Government.
               *' They wero informed, in roply, tlmt tho communications formerly entered into with
           thorn by tho British Government had references 6olely to the advance of the Egyptian
           troopB, and the connection subsisting betweon His Highness Mohammed Ali Pasha with
           Nejd; but that these circumstanooa being now altogether changed, and the impending
           danger removed by tho departure of tho troopi under Khurshed Pasha from that province, it
           was now tho intention of the British Government to withdraw from all interference in the
           internal affairs of Arabia/'
               414.  At this very time too tho Resident received a communication from
           the Amir himself, expressive of a desire for tho renewal of the amicable
           relations which had existed between his father Turki and tho British
           Government. Proper rosponse was made to this demonstration of amity,
           and the Amir was further informed that tho solo object of tho British Gov­
           ernment in this quarter was the suppression of plunder and bloodshed on tho
           seas, and the security of all well-disposed inhabitants on the shores of the Gulf.
               415.  In September 1843 tho Bombay Government (at that time headed
           by Sir George Arthur) enquired of the Government of India what policy
           should be pursued towards Feysal. The Bombay Government considered
           that as long as the Chief remained within his former possessions no inter­
           ference would he necessary, but it nevertheless doubted whether he should be
           allowed to obtain a preponderating influence at Bahrein and with the Arab
           Chiefs who were under treaty engagements to us. To this reference the
           Governor-General (Lord Ellenborough) in Council replied simply that it
           was “not at present necessary or expedient to interfere with the proceedings
           of the Chief/*
               416.  In December of the 8ame year Amir Feysal interposed in a quarrel
                                          between two rival claimants for the
                Wahabi interference at Bahrein.
                                          Chief8hip of Bahrein, and having secured
           the victory for his own protege, appropriated the fort of Demaum as the
           reward of his assistance. On the 26th August 1844 the Bombay Government
                     Britieh policy.      renewed its enquiry “as to the policy
                                          which should be pursued in the now
           certain event of Amir Feysal, the legitimate Wahabi Ruler, extending his
           authority over the Chiefs of Oman, and especially if he endeavoured to
           effect this object by 6ea.” It was pointed out that Feysal’s proceedings
           might ultimately endanger our relations with Oman and the martime Arab
           Chiefs, and so tend to resumption of piracy. And the letter concluded as
            follows:—
               w It does not therefore appear to the Governor in Council unworthy of consideration
           whether the Resident in the Persian Gulf should not at once endeavour to effect an arrange­
            ment with Amir Feysal, ratifying and securing existing engagements at sea. In other
           words, that, as the price of forbearance on the part of the British Government, this Chief
           should become a party to its maritime engagements, whereby commercial interests may be
           secured.
               “ As the not improbable event 6f the Wahabi Ruler enoroaohiug ou the possessions of
            His Highness the Imam of Maskat, an old ally of the British Government, is a contingency
            which ought to be provided for, this Government is desirous of being favoured with the
            sentiments of the Right Hcn'ble the Governor-General in Counoil on this point/'
               No official reply was issued to this application, but the view adopted
            by the Government of India was evidently that suggested in Lord Hardinge’a
            brief remark on the haok of the letter, vis,—“ No case for interference has
            arisen/*
              # 417. Early in the year 1846 Syud bin Mutluk came to Brymi from
           Nejd and at once all the neighbouring Arab tribeB, inspired perhaps as much
                                                                       2 o
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254