Page 124 - Arabian Studies (V)
P. 124

114                                       Arabian Studies V
              Awqaf of §an‘a’ in 1161/1748 an office which he discharged
              honestly for a few years then resigned from it, but left in his will
               100 qirsh (riyals) to charity and 100 to the poor of the Banu
              Hashim, out of scruples about the waqf.m
                In point of fact al-Amir clearly sought that the Imams should
              enforce a just Islamic administration which it was probably imprac­
              ticable for them to implement without losing the effective political
              support of their followers. When al-Mansur succeeded to the
               Imamate he counselled him in verse137 to entrust just persons with
              charge of the peasantry (al-ra'aya) and he points to the tyranny
               (jawr) of the assessor, tax-gatherer and collector of the tithe
               (muthammir, qabbad, ‘ashshar). He inveighs against customs and
               tolls (mukiis), as do all Islamic 'ulama\ not only those of the Zaydl
               school, though it is an open question whether any Islamic ruler has
               ever dispensed with this source of revenue. He makes a strong
               attack138 on giving zakat money to the ‘turbaned’ (al-
               mu'ammamuna) and the House of the Imam—which indeed is
               prohibited the ‘AJawis by the sharVah—perhaps the Qudah are to
               be included here with the ‘Alawls? He urged al-Mahdi ‘Abbas to
               send teachers to the remoter villages, towns and country-side
               (bawadi) to remove idolatrous beliefs in trees, stones and domes
               iqubab)—i.e., saint-cults.139 Al-Mahdi assented to this and his
               governors took over a great wealth of property devoted to these
               ‘idols’. In short al-Amir’s standpoint was that of Zaydl orthodoxy,
               certainly not a polemic against the Imamate as an institution. If one
               can honestly construe the opposition to al-Amir over his utilisation
               of Sunni collections of Hadith Tradition as an attack on the exer­
               cise of independent judgement (ijtihad), Imam Ahmad cannot be
               accused of ignoring the Sunni canonical works, for, in making his
               decisions by ijtihad, he had no hesitation in selecting from them
               when he thought it appropriate to do so.
                 Al-Badr al-Amir is buried in the cemetery (hawtah) south-west of
               the minaret of al-Madrasah Mosque.

  i
               A l-Shaft‘l and the Yemen
               The Shafi'i school of Islam is far from being opposed in principle
               to the ‘Alawis, Sayyids or Ashraf, and HadramI Sayyids are
               numbered among the leading divines in the branches of this Sunni
               rite in south Arabia and Indonesia. Al-Shafii himself went to the
  '
               Yemen during the reign of the ‘Abbasid Caliph al-Rashid and,
               according to the author of Ghayat al-amani,140 ‘he entered San‘a’
               and received ‘ilm [learning] from the QadI of San‘a’ who was at the
 :
               day Hisham b. Yusuf [the Abna’i]141 and from Mutarrif b.
 I
 :
  ; ■
  ; ■
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129