Page 241 - The Art & Architecture of the Ancient Orient_Neat
P. 241

PART two: the peripheral
                                                                          regions
















                                           Figure 107. Two halberd blades, frona Luristan




                    motif in the  ancient Mesopotamian monster, the lion-headed eagle Imdugud (Plates 27
                    and 32). The inflated cheeks, the square cars, the eyes with the inner corner pointing
                   downwards, these are specific evidence of the derivation, which is, moreover, corrobo­
                   rated by the spreading feathers of the tail, which is all that remains of the bird in figure
                    104A and has become a beard in the other halberd and some other examples. Once again
                   we  observe the stimulus which die smiths of Luristan found in ancient Mesopotamian
                   themes. But this connexion raises a problem of very wide import, for it seems, then, that
                   through the Luristan bronzes die ‘animal style’ of the steppes, the ‘art of the northern
                   nomads is tied to the basic repertoire of western Asia - that of Sumer. The first question
                   is that of the relation between the art of Luristan and that of the nomads, in particular
                   the Scythians.
                     Now it is remarkable that the zoormorphic juncture, so characteristic for Luristan, is
                   absent from the earliest Scythian metal-work. In south Russia the earliest pieces - from
                   the Kostromskaya, Kelermes, and Melgunov barrows - show animals shaped in the
                   typical Scythian manner, compact, sharply edged, richly andered, but without zoo-
                   morphic junctures. The Scythian objects found in the hoard at Zawiyeh, equally early
                   in the development of Scythian art, also lack the zoomorphic juncture. In Scythian art
                   the zoomorphic juncture seems to have been an addition to the ‘animal style’, but in
                   Luristan it is part of the prevalent procedure of using natural forms irrespective of their
                   meaning or organic coherence for ornamental purposes. The zoomorphic juncture is
                  applied to pole-tops and pins, cheek-pieces, and weapons, with a freedom and variety
                  which one would expect in the application of a native invention. Thus there appears to
                  be a case for supposing that the Scythians derived the zoomorphic juncture from Lun-

                  stan.
                    The full import of that conclusion cannot be discussed here. It seems  that eastern
                  examples of zoomorphic juncture depend on western     inspiration,39 and since, in any
                  case influences from the West are known to have travelled east through the steppes, a
                  new significance may attach to the resemblance of some Tao Tieh heads of Chinese art
                  m the residual head of the Sumerian bird Imdugud in figure 107; they have t e same
                  bulging checks, slanting eyes, and square ears. The same head, rather than die on-mas',

                                                          212





                                                                                                    A
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246