Page 278 - The Art & Architecture of the Ancient Orient_Neat
P. 278

NOTES
          ii. At Hama in north Syria a stone head was apparently introduced into Asia by Middle Minoan
        found in early, allegedly chalcolithic, layers. It is   trade were ancestral to all those used afterwards in
        rather rough and badly preserved. It wears the that area. *
        conical cap. The eyes were inlaid and the head   23. F. Bisson dc la Roeque, G. Contenau, F. p. 13S
        formed part of a statue completely carved in stone, Chapouthier, Le Trisor de Tod (Institut Francis
        two features which suggest a more advanced stage d’archeologic orientale, Documents dc Fouillcs, xr,
        of sculpture than the figures from Brak. Moreover, Cairo, 1953)-
        the figures from Hama (there were four) were al- 24. q^ cj(, platc xxxi, bottom right.The Aegean
        most  lifcsizc. See Harold Ingholt, Rapport prelinii-  features of the hoard have been studied in detail by
        noire stir sept companies dc fouillcs <1 Hama (Copen- chapouthier.
        liagcn, 1940), 25 and plate vii, 1. The closest parallels   25. Furumark’s refusal, in Opuscula archaeologica,
        to the head published there arc found in such Early   vi (Lund, 1930), to acknowledge Aegean influence
        Dynastic sculptures as I illustrated in Sculpture of   when running spiral patterns occur unless exact
        the Third Millennium, plate 30, c and d, but the
                                                 Aegean parallels arc known, is unwarranted. The
        Hama sculptures were covered with a coating of
                                                 unending running spiral patterns differ in essence
        painted plaster.
                                                 from those used normally in Ancient Near Eastern
          12. Max von Oppenheim, Tell I-Ialaf (London decoration. Moreover they have notliing to do with
        and New York, 1933), 226-52, plates lxii-lxiii.   the spectacle spirals which arc an obvious embcllish-
        Most of the comparisons made and conclusions  ment t0 the workcr itl mctal (aC Ur> Hissarlik, and
        reached arc baseless.                    elsewhere), or with the isolated imitations of num-
          13. Encyclopedic photographique de l'art, 1, 204.  mulites or ammonites on prcdynastic Egyptian
          14. Contenau, Manuel d'Archcologic Orientale, pots. The running spiral appears, in Egypt as well
        673, figures 467-8.                      as in Asia, for short periods during which intcr-
   p. 136   15. A basalt object which can  bc called either course with the Aegean is proved to have existed by
        stele or statue was found at Tell Brak. It is 1*45 m.   importation of pottery and other objects. It is
        high, and the rounded top is made to resemble the  perverse to deny that the running spiral decoration,
        hair surrounding a face of which nose and eyebrows,  which is not universal but has certain well-defined
        and drill-holes for eyes, arc indicated. It recalls the  areas of popularity in the old and the new worlds,
        limestone stele from the first city of Troy (p. 112);  made an intermittent appearance in Western Asia
        but crude works made in out-of-the-way places  and Egypt as a result of contact with one of its
        arc not necessarily very ancient. Sec Syria, xi (1930),  centres of distribution, namely the area stretching
        360-4.                                   from the Danube southwards to Crete.
          16. See J. A. Wilson, in American Journal of  26. H. E. Winlock, The Treasure of Three
        Semitic Languages, lviii (1941), 225-36; S. Smith, Egyptian Princesses (New York, 1948), plate xxiv.
        Alalakh and Chronology (London, 1940).     27. ivory inlays of a somewhat later period were
   P- >37  17. Contenau, Manuel d*Archcologie Orientale, found at El-Jisr, in Palestine. They also show strong
        2296, figure 1304. Schaeffer, Ugaritica, 11, plate xxii.  Egyptian influence while remaining quite un-
          18. Pierre Montet, Byhlos et l'£gyptc (Paris, Egyptian. See Quarterly of the Department of An-
        1928). Objects which have probably the same tiquities in Palestine, xii (1946), 31-42 and plate 14.
        provenance in Bulletin du Music de Beyrouth, 1 (Paris,  2S. On terra-cotta figurines from Byblos, see
        I937). 7-21, plates i-iv.
                                                 Maurice Dunand, Fouillcs de Byblos (Paris, 1939),
          19. F. W. von Bissing, Ein Thebanischer Grabftmd plates xlvii-li. On a gold-covered bronze fig  urc
        aus dent Anfang des Neuen Reichs.       from Ras Shamra, sec C. F. A. Schaeffer, The Cunei-
          2°. G. Karo, Die Schachtgrdber von Myhcnac,  firm Texts from Ras Shamra Ugarit (Schweich
        plates xci-xciv and 132-42, where other examples Lectures, 1936), plate 33.
        ound on the Greek mainland arc mentioned. Karo 29. The nearest parallel is the head-dress of the
        ignore tic act that the niello technique was known Muu-danccrs at Egyptian funerals. See Journal of
        muc car >et in Syria. Sec Helene J. Kantor, The  Egyptian Archaeology, xi (1925), plate v; E. Brunner
              an 1 lC ricnt *H ^ie Second Millennium B.C.,  Traut, Dcr Tanz ini alten Agypten (Gliickstadt,
                                                 1928), 43, 53-9; J. Vandicr, in Chronique d’Egypte,
         21. Kantor, op. cit., 18-21.            1944, 35 ff.
         M. Rrntor, op. cit., 77 states rightly: ‘It would be  30. It is quite inadmissible to ‘read’ such decora­
        oversimplification-  to assume that the spirals  tions as if they told a story, as is done by R. Dus-

                                              249
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283