Page 36 - Arab Navigation in the Indian Ocean (before portuguese)_Neat
P. 36
\
\
440 ARAB NAVIGATION Till- TOPOGRAPHY OF THE NAVIGATIONAL TEXTS 441
I
is mentioned several times. The Rub< al-Khali Jli-I gj is mentioned i>J' at this latitude and this is a well-known bay east of Bir (AIi
once by Ibn Majid. Mahra #*11 are a people politically dominant in having two villages called ‘Ain Ba Ma‘bad and ‘Ain al-Juwairi on
Soqotra according to Ibn Majid. They are the people of Sulaiman the shore. Khairi may be a corruption of this latter name for
al-Mahri and nowadays reside on the coast between Masila and or may be a corruption of* the word Hamra or Humairi the
Fartak and inland behind the Zafar region. mountain behind the eastern end of the Gulf y or ^y). Qutami
Beginning from the southern entrance to the Red Sea, Bab al- gives ^ at 48° 54'N, 14° 1 l'E but this latitude seems too
Mandab, and working eastwards along the coast ESE for a zam close to Barum.83 The islands opposite Hu$n al-Ghurab and between t
and then E by S the first place we encounter is al-'Ara SjUl (once Bir ‘Ali and Ra*s al-Kalb ((Portuguese ya canacani) occur only if
in the plural si^UI in the Leningrad texts). This is the southernmost once in the Fawa'id as Jaza’ir al-Qana lUJI J\y). Qana (Cana) was (1;
if
point of the Arabian Peninsula half-way between the Red Sea the old South Arabian port mentioned in the Periplus and by
entrance and Aden, placed at 4J° P.S. by the Minhaj. The name Ptolemy. Apart from this one reference this great port of antiquity i ■
occurs in Portuguese charts and has remained to the present day. and its neighbourhood are completely ignored by the navigators. i
To the east of al-‘Ara is a large lagoon used by native boats as a At 5J° P.S. the Minhaj places Barum fjj, still important as one of
harbour now known as Khor Umeira and mentioned once by Ibn the few safe anchorages during the SW monsoon. At this latitude
Majid as al-'Umaira L^JI. Beyond this appears Darzina ojjb the ‘Umda places Mukalla (*^C and ^Tl), today the important port i
mentioned several times by Ibn Majid and once by Sulaiman. It of this region. Ibn Majid does not mention this place in the Faua'id
appears to be a cape across the bay from Aden and may be Ras but it occurs in some of his poems. East of Mukalla comes al-Shihr I
Kaan or Ras ‘Imran. The former is perhaps the most likely as it the Portuguese Xaher or Xael, this was by far the most im I
appears to be mountainous. It occurs in early Portuguese charts portant port on the coast after Aden, but now only a very inferior
west of Aden.82 The city and harbour of Aden jo*- appears next and place. Ra's Sharma a cape and a bay still bearing this name t
requires no description. I have already mentioned that it was the some distance east of Shihr is placed by the Minhaj at 6° P.S. It is I
most important place on the coast. Its latitude was 5° P.S. in all also 125 zam due west of Azadiyu in India. No other text mentions
the texts and it was E by N of al-‘Ara and WSW of Fartak according it and the ‘Umda gives J-*- Mt. Marzuban at this latitude, a
to the 'Umda. However Aden consists of two separate peninsulas of name that cannot be found anywhere else. Further east was the ii
volcanic hills now known as Aden and Little Aden. The main peak fairly important port of Hairij gty at 6£° P.S. This name completely ;
of Aden itself is Jebel Shamsan which is mentioned by disappeared from the maps, but according to Serjeant is still re
.. name by both Portuguese and the Arab navigators. Similarly men membered as being on the west side of the W. Masila mouth,84
tioned by the navigators is Jebel Ihsan uL^-t a conspicuous double perhaps where the Sharkhat ruins are located on the Internat. 1:1m i
peak on Little Aden. Beyond Aden the ‘Umda gives Ghubbat Abyan map. Al-Mishqas too was in this area and has since dis -i
0^1 v- at 5i° P.S. This is the bay opposite the wadi plain still called appeared, although Horsburgh mentions Misenaat now Musaina‘a il
by this name (Portuguese abiam). The Minhaj on the other hand with considerable ruins 32 miles from Saihut. From the texts it i!
places Ahwar jyA at 5J° P.S.: this is some distance east of Abyan would appear to be another port between Hairij and Fartak but
and slightly north in latitude. It still appears on modern maps as a Serjeant applies the name to the whole region east of Shihr past the
village (aerodrome) and wadi. Ibn Majid also mentions it and it mouth of the Wadi Masila.85 It is most likely that it represents the
occurs in the masafa tables 30 zam due west of Sha‘b Soqotra. port of Qishn never mentioned by the navigators, but found in !i
Between Ahwar and Abyan is the now deserted village of Maqdtin Serjeant’s texts and on Portuguese charts. Ra's Fartak dky is
mentioned once by Ibn Majid. the prominent cape which has always played a great part in Indian
Jabal al-Khairi ^jd-l given by the ‘Umda at 5-J0 P.S. is un Ocean navigation and in the politics of the south coast of Arabia.
I identified but may be a corrupt reading. The Minhaj gives al-'Ain In the first instance it is the place where ships leave the coast in
8* A selection of early Portuguese maps and charts can be found in Kammerer: 83 Dali/ al-Mukhtar, p. 54. • iv
84 Portuguese, p. 54, note 5.
La Mcr Rouge, tome III, 3e ptie. Plates (a) cxlix, (b) clxiv, (c) clxx, (d) clxxiv, :
(e) clxxx give most of the places mentioned. Darzina occurs in a, b and e, 85 Portuguese, p. 101, note 5. Horsburgh: vol. 2, p. 367. Musaina'a is in
Abiam in d but with different spellings elsewhere, Canacani(m) in all. i Qutami, p. 53. ‘ •I-
Ff ii
I
i