Page 204 - Arabiab Studies (IV)
P. 204

194                                       Arabian Studies IV
                  advice to this Imam and in particular was concerned with the success of
                  the Muiji’ah and Qadariyyah schools that had started in $ubar. In
                   Muhanna’s reign he openly clashed with the other great ‘Slim of the time
                   A. ‘Abdullah Muhammad b. Mabbub b. al-Rabll (W.40b) over the
                   question of the creation of the Qur’an. He seems to have died before
                   MuhannS(d. 237/851).
                   (iii)  The reply of A. ’1-yawari Muhammad b. al-Hawari (W.34) to the
                   people of Hadramawt (discussed in section III).
                   (iv)  a Slrah of A. ‘Abdullah Muhammad b.  Mabbub (W.40b) to the
                   people of the Maghrib.

                    More or less contemporary works concerning the deposing of
                    al-$alt b. Malik (272/886)
                    7. Apart from various correspondence between the Imam himself and the
                    ‘uiamS’ there are several very important works by his supporters which
                    were to form the basis for Rustaq party dogma. Amongst these are the
                    following works which give a great deal of historic detail: the K.
                    al-Afrdath wa-’l-$ifat, the Bayan wa-’l-burhan, and a letter to A. Jabir
                    Muhammad b. Ja‘far (W.46), all by A. ’1-Mu’thir (W.36); the Sirah of A.
                    Qabtan (W.37).

                    Material relevant to the Rustaq-Nizwa parties' dispute and to the
                    history of the Imamate in the 5th/11th century
                    8.  Among this should be noted the following works of A. al-Hasan
                    al-BisyawI (W.33):
                    (i)  a Slrah to some of his contemporaries called Slrat al-Su’al (fi'l-wilayah
                    wa-’l-bara’ah).
                    (ii)  Sirah f'a$l ma ’khtalafat fihi al-ummah. This is about early schisms
                    which split Islam.
                    (iii)  a reply to A. Sa^d al-Kudaml (W.39). N.B. It is not entirely clear
                    whether this is in fact a direct reply to him or part of a general rebuttal of
                    Nizwa party arguments.
                    (iv)  a Sirah about al-Haf§ b. Rashid’s expedition against al-Muthar b.
                    ‘Abdullah during his first *aqd (election), tfafs was Imam around the
                    middle of the 5th/11th century. There was considerable dispute about the
                    way he succeeded his father and a subsequent cover-up election seems to
                    have been carried out. Despite the dubiousness of his conduct he seems to
                    have been a forceful leader who defended his country from an invasion
                    from ‘Iraq (to which this Sirah refers).
                    9.  A whole series of documents relevant to the Imamate of Rashid b. ‘All
                    (approximately the last quarter of the 5th/11th century but possibly
                    extending to c. 513 A.H.). This is the period when the Imamate really fell
                    apart and the Rustaq party itself began to elect rival Imams. A detailed
                    study of these documents would help clarify this very confused period of
                    history. Among them we should note the following:
                    (i) the tawbah (repentance) made (472/1079) by the Imam Rashid b. ‘All
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209