Page 207 - Arabiab Studies (IV)
P. 207

The Omani Manuscript Collection at Muscat              197
         who wanted to depose their Imam, in which he points out the issues
         involved (cf. J.M. 6 iv). From 249 A.H. until his death in 260/873 he
         was chief QadI in $uhar and was responsible for a number of the rulings
         concerning the taxation of merchants involved in Oman’s rapidly
         developing foreign trade.
         (iii) Bashir, son of (ii)
         Al-SalimI in the Lum'ah (W.21a) lists five works by him. From some of
         the titles and from the extracts seen (notably in J.M. 1 and Bk. V,
         Ch.VI of Jum‘ah al-$a’ighl’s Jawhar) it is clear that Bashir (as too his
         brother ‘Abdullah) was very much concerned with problems arising
         from the foreign occupation after the Civil War.
       W. 41 A. ‘Abdullah ‘Uthman b. A. ‘Uthman, known as al-A$amm
         Book XXVI of his al-Taj, copied from the original in 1107/1696, is
         bound in with Book IX of the K. al Piya’ (W.42a) of ‘AwtabI
         (acquisition number 461 or 469).
       W. 42 Salmah b. Muslim al-‘AwtabI
         (i)  al-Qiya’ Books III, V, IX, X and XIII. From the internal evidence of
         this and other works I would now place the piya’in the late 5th/11th
         century; it is strongly influenced by the extreme Rustaq school teaching
         of Ibn Barakah (W.44) and A. al-tfasan al-BisyawI (W.33), both of
         whom are quoted (the latter was the teacher of Salmah’s teacher’s
         teacher). Unfortunately the text of the piya’ itself gives no kunyah.
         (ii)  Extant in MSS nos. 138 and 1409 is a sirah by A. ’1-Mundhir (sic)
         Salmah b. Muslim al-‘AwtabI to ‘All b. ‘AH and his brother al-tfasan b.
         ‘All al-KilawI (Kilwah). This is also found in MS 138 of Qalhatl’s
         al-Sfrat al-Kilawiyyah (cf. W.52 below), but time did not permit a
         detailed comparison of the two texts. Since the latter was probably
         written in connection with events towards the middle of the 6th/12th
         century (discussed in W.52 below), this Sirah is probably by the
         younger ‘AwtabI (i.e. the author of the Ansab). If, in fact, this is the
         case, then I think we can conclude that ‘AwtabI senior’s floruit was
         toward the pnd of the 5th/11th century and his grandson’s during the
         first half of the 6th/12th century.
       W. 44 Ibn Barakah
         (i)  K. al-Muwazanah (see J.M. 10 iii)
         (ii)  The second part of Ibn Barakah’s Jami‘ has been printed (cf. A.
         Muhammad ‘Abdullah b. Muhammad b. Barakah al-BahlawI al-
         ‘Umanl, K. al-Jami" ed. ‘isa b. Yahya al-Barum, Turathuna series, II,
         1974).
       W. 46 Ibn Ja‘far (A. Jabir Muhammad b. Ja‘far)      ( . .
         JSmi*. In many such collections of rulings by early ulama it is
         frequently difficult to distinguish what has been added by way of
         commentary. In the particular copy examined of this work (No. 1216,
         cf. Smith V.104) the difference has clearly been shown by the copyist
         and this helps considerably in discovering whether the rulings existed in
         the time of the First Imamate or not.
       W. 48 Ibn al-Na^ar family                   , ,  . . .  .
         From the content of other works (notably the Bay&n al-shary it is clear
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212