Page 343 - The Arabian Gulf States_Neat
P. 343

■^1



                         SUBMARINE BOUNDARIES                   279
          The proclamations issued by the Gulf Shaikhdoms, under British
        auspices, arc all similar, if not identical. In issuing them, the Rulers
        were, no doubt, encouraged by the great hopes of the existence of
        great oil deposits beneath the high sea waters of the Gulf. In order to
        form a clear view about the main issues involved in these proclama­
        tions, the following operative paragraphs of the Bahrain Proclamation
        may be quoted, as an example:
          . . . Whereas the right of any coastal government to exercise its sove­
        reignty over the natural resources of the sea-bed and the sub-soil in the
        vicinity of its shores has been established by international practice through
        the action taken by other governments . . .
          We ... the Ruler of Bahrain hereby declare that the sea-bed and the
        sub-soil of the high seas of the Persian Gulf bordering on the territorial
        waters of Bahrain and extending seaward as far as limits that we, after
        consultation with neighbouring governments, shall determine more accur­
        ately in accordance with the principles of justice, when the occasion so
        requires, belong to the country of Bahrain and are subject to its absolute
        authority and jurisdiction.1
        The above proclamations represented at the time a new development
        of claims to large portions of the sea-bed and sub-soil of the Arabian
        Gulf lying beyond the territorial seas of the countries concerned.2
        (a) Common features of the Proclamations of 1949
        The Proclamations of the Arabian Gulf States of 1949, have the follow­
        ing characteristics in common: (a) They all seem to avoid the use of
        the expression ‘continental shelf’ which does not stricto sensu exist
        in the Arabian Gulf which is a shallow sea of much less than 100
        fathoms deep.3 Accordingly, they uniformly regard the contiguity of
        the sea-bed and sub-soil of the high sea areas to the territorial seas of
        the littoral States concerned as the basis of the claims asserted.4 In
        contrast, it should be noted that the Iranian draft legislation of 1949.
        which was passed as a law on 19 June 1955,5 refers to the Persian
          1 For the English text of the Proclamation of Bahrain No. 37/1368, 5 June 1949,
        sec A.J.I.L., Suppl. 43 (1949), pp. 185-6. See also Appendix IX.
          3 See Young, R., ‘Further Claims to Areas Beneath the High Seas*, A.J.I.L., 43
        (1949), p. 790, where he maintains that the claims thus asserted ‘represent a further
        development along somewhat divergent lines of the continental shelf doctrine
        enunciated by the United States in 1945’.
          3 See R. Young’s commentary on ‘Saudi Arabian Offshore Legislation’, A.J.I.L.
        43 (1949), p. 531.
          4 See Young, R., ‘The Legal Status of Submarine Areas Beneath the High Seas’,
        A.J.I.L., 45 (1951), p. 239, where he states that ‘it has been suggested that the most
        satisfactory basis for the claims is to regard submarine areas as appurtenant to the
        contiguous coastal state in a manner analogous to the appurtenance of territorial
        waters’.
          5 For the French text of the Iranian Law on the continental shelf, see U.N.L.S.,
        High Seas (1957) p. 25.
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348