Page 381 - The Arabian Gulf States_Neat
P. 381

SETTLEMENT OF BAHRAIN-IRAN DISPUTE        317

           Consequently, intermittent and indirect discussions, conducted
         through British diplomatic channels, took place, during the first half
         of 1969, between Bahraini and Iranian officials. The object of the
         discussions was to seek an agreement on “the terms of reference of
         the United Nations Secretary-General's mission. In the course of
         those discussions the Bahraini officials took a firm position against
         the adoption of the “terms of reference”, originally proposed,
         which described the Bahraini issue as a “dispute”, between two
         members of the United Nations (namely, Britain and Iran), within
         the meaning of Articles 34 & 35 of the United Nations Charter.
           The Bahraini officials, in objecting to the said proposal, argued
         that as an independent government, Bahrain did not come within the
         scope of the above two articles which deal with the “pacific
         settlement” of disputes between two or more members of the
         United Nations. Bahrain's territory was not a subject of dispute
         between Britain and Iran, they stated. From the view-point of the
         Bahraini officials, Bahrain was an original party in the dispute with
         Iran. However, since Iran did not recognise Bahrain as an
         independent government, it was thought expedient to approach the
         Secretary-General of the United Nations on this question in the
         name of the United Kingdom, the latter acting in her capacity as a           :
         member state of the United Nations to which Bahrain had entrusted
         the conduct of her foreign relations. Iran, being the other party
         involved in the settlement of the question, had also to make a similar
         approach to the Secretary-General.1
           Consequently, at Bahrain’s request, Britain and Iran agreed to
         adopt a form of terms of reference which contained neither the word
         “dispute” nor the express references to “Britain” and “Iran”.
         Accordingly, the Terms of Reference, as finally agreed upon by all
         parties concerned were as follows:
              “Having regard to the problem created by the differing views of the
              parties concerned about the status of Bahrain and the need to find a    ; •;
              solution to this problem in order to create an atmosphere of
              tranquility, stability and friendliness throughout the area, the
              Secretary-General of the United Nations is requested by the parties
              concerned to send a Personal Representative to ascertain the wishes
              of the people of Bahrain’’.2
                                                                                      :
           After agreeing to these terms of reference, the parties discussed          .
         the procedure, or the method of operation, of the good offices               ! ;
         mission of the Secretary-General’s Personal Representative. For
         their part, the Iranians did not wish to approve, in advance, a written
         document stipulating the procedural steps, or the method of                  i

         1.  Private notes of author.
         2.  U.N. Document S/9726 (28 March 1970), p. 2.
   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386