Page 386 - The Arabian Gulf States_Neat
P. 386

322      I MF LEGAL STATUS OF THE ARABIAN GULF STATES
                   the members of the Council to vote on a draft resolution, prepared in
                   advance, on this question.
                     The resolution stated:

                    The Security Council,
                  ^ Noting tcommunication from the Secretary-General to the Security

                    Noting the statements made by the representatives of Iran and the United
                   Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in their letters to the
                  Secretary-General of 9 March 1970 and 20 March 1970, respectively,
                     1.  Endorses the report of the Secretary-General's Personal Representa­
                  tive, which has been circulated to the Security Council, under cover of a
                  note from the Secretary-General, on 30 April 1970.
                    2. Welcomes the conclusions and findings of the report, in particular that
                  “the overwhelming majority of the people of Bahrain wish to gain
                  recognition of their identity in a fully independent and sovereign State free
                  to decide for itself its relations with other States".1
                    The above resolution was adopted unanimously by all the 15
                  members of the Security Council. It is significant that all the
                  representatives who attended the debate indicated their wish to
                  speak after, rather than before, the vote.2

                  The Role of the Secretary-General in the Bahrain Question
                    The method employed by the Secretary-General in exercising his
                  good offices mission to ascertain the wishes of the people of
                  Bahrain regarding Iran’s claim to their country has been considered
                  as a unique departure from United Nations customary practice.
                  This view was not shared, of course, by the then Secretary-General,
                  U Thant, who was at pains to prove that the exercise of his good
                  offices mission in the Bahrain problem was customary in the United
                  Nations practice. The controversy on this issue may be explained
                  below.
                  In his announcement on 28 March 1970, the Secretary-General
                  stated, inter alia:
                    “In response to approaches made to him in letters he has received from
                  the Governments of Iran and the United Kingdom, he has agreed to
                  exercise his good offices in a matter pertaining to Bahrain. In agreeing to
                  this, the Secretary-General has had in mind that actions such as this by the
                  Secretary-General at the request of Member States, have become
                  customary in United Nations practice and have proved to be valuable
                  means of relieving and preventing tension by a quiet approach in certain
                  situations which could be prolonged or aggravated by premature disclosure
                  and public debate”.
                    The announcement added the assurance that “the plan agreed

                     U.N. Document SI RES/278 (11 May 1970)
                  2. See U.N. Document, S/PV. 1536 pp. 7-10.
   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391