Page 255 - 7 Persian Trade rep Muscat 1_Neat
P. 255

3
         to \jC expected. Arn-.s in large quantities wcro openly   Shares of Trade.
         *aportta and wcro snuggled out again. Their value
         nurcared in the return of import**, but not amongst   Tho following (able shows the portion of the total
         the experts. This year, however, arms and ammuni­  trado of Muscat takon by different countries. As-
         tion have altogether vanished from the returns. So   usual, tho lion's sharo has fallen to India. This pre­
         tl;e rc<uon must bo sought elsewhere. It is true that   ponderance ia partly genuine and natural, and partly
         llic Sultan's Customs imposes nu import duty and   unreal. Tho' statistics of trade with India are more
         keeps record of imports, whilo, in the absence of any   • carefully kept than those of trade with some other
         expert duty, it docs not take the fame account of ex­  ! countries, such as Persia, a good deal of which
         ports. But in Muscat one agency, M of Era. To well and   escapes unregistered. On the other hand the Indian
         Co, rejresenta all the steamer lincH vrLich call, and   figures include all goods which Muscat receives or
         this firm is good enough to give full information to   despatches ciu an Indian port. For example, there
         the Coi6ulato. So far then ns goods conveyed by   aro seven brands of matches now on salo in Muscat.
         steamer arc concerned, there is no ground for believ­  Three of these are of Austrian origin (exported pre­
         ing the export figures to be more incomplete than the   sumably before the war), two Japanese, one Swedish
         imports. For it is only from Muscat that goods arc   and one Norwegian. All alike, having been received
         shipped by steamer. It ia now six jeara winco the   here from Bombay, arc shown under tho figures of
         practice was introduced .of recording steamer-borne   Indian trade.
         ImfSc separately frera wares conveyed by sailing
         vessel. In every year save one—ll) 11-12—during
         this period the deficiency of steamcr-lomo exports,
         as compared with steamer-borne imports, has been as   Table.
         large as, or larger than, the gross deficiency. From                Percent-
         this it would seem, either that the experts and im­  Couct-j.  Imports. Export*. Total. age of tie
         ports do not balance, which is unlikely, or that the                 whole.
         explanation of the dis-craj ancy murl be sought in the   Ra.  P.t.  R«.
         incumpleteccss of the record of the ailing vcsscl-
         bc-rae trade. And chi* is in itself intrinsically pro­  Aden  . 7,24,993  1,24,991   193
         bable. For, as we lmve seen, the Custems docs n-d   Arab Coa-t  41,300  1,71,S32   2.1G.1S2   334
         record this export traffic, and only so much of it is
         fhown as is earned on dhows owned by British sub­  France  .   1,052  1,052   002
         jects, vho-c articles are deposited in ;he Consulate.   Germany .
         Moreover. Muscat is a distributing centre from which   India •
         much that comes in by steamer would naturally go   . 20,95,462 21,18,519 52.14.0S1   80 63
         out a gun by boat. Lastly, the data which are on   Persia   . •   4-1.053   72.S31  1,16, SSI   1-78
         record about the sail nag vessel trade Kent to imply
        incompleteness. For example, practically the whole   Sweden  .   46.500  4 ’,509   0-72
        of this traffic is shown as to or from India. But as   • Shalt-al-Arab .   425   13,103   13,913   0-23
        a matur of fact there is a very considerable wird-   United Kingdom.   87,913  87,9 i» 1*36
         berne commerce between Muscat on the ono hand, j
        and thi ports of Mc-kran, the Persian Gulf, and   United States of
        Zanzibar on the other. The whole of this apparent­  America.   .   ...  2.62,000  2.62,900  4-07
        ly goes unrecorded.                   Zanzibar          1,65,350   1,65,350   2 56
          Trade went from bsd to worse this year. The   Other Countries . 2,03,187   14,75*  2,17,941   3 37
        total volume of registered traffic shrank from
        Rs- 90.38,270 in 1914-15 to Rs. 64,67,741 this year, a
        decline of nearly 29 per cent. Owing to the war   Total Rs. . 36,44.912 2S^2,S29 64,67,741 1QOO0
        and the consequent shortage of shipping and high   Figures for last
        freights the steamer-torae trade diminished even   year  . 49,14,177 41.24,093 90.38,270
        more markedly than b the previous year, while,
        although wind-borne traffic nearly doubled, the total   • Sub-tituted fur Turkey ia Asia.
        amount of this still falls a good deal short of the
        steamer trade. A comparison of figures of quantity
        *i«h those of value shows that fluctuation of prices   What has been said abore shows how misleading
        had sono effect on the totals. All the chief articles   these figures a re, and explains why Japan does not
        °f import, except coffee, declined in price. AraoDgst   appear at all, while Great Britain and the United
        exports, dateB fell, while Muscat fabrics showed &   States have by no mein* their proper place. The
        Urge increase. But, eTen when allowance has been   decline in steamer-borne trade with Persia is very
        m^de for these variations, the falling off in trade,   marked. This is the very trade most likely to suffer
        U)th export and import, remains serious. The chief   from a shortage of steamers in the Galf, but,
        caaws ire the effects of the European war on ship­  no doubt, an unrecorded increase in the sailing
        ping and markets And the disturbances in the interior   vessel traffic has to come extent compensated for the
        of Omaa.                              falling-off.
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260