Page 83 - 7 Persian Trade rep Muscat 1_Neat
P. 83

5
                                               Figures here ng.ria conflict with the Customs
       rj.V, ani colours,—-There is a slight full under
       '   » yellow ochre. Tho other paints and  returns. For instance, tho Customs do not admit
     ',  ‘ ^own for tho first timo separately «crc  that any arms an-1 ammunition arc exported at all,
     ° bably included under “ Miscellaneous ” in previous   though our fig ires of manifested cargo show an
                                             export of R38.735 and it ia known that large and
     J»n»’ returns.                          valuable consignments of arms went out of Maskat
    J r* nl;ts.—The trade has apparently doubled, and   in sailing vessels apart from this. Smuggling
     . would appear that tho Indian middleman still
                                             ratunlly tool: pla^c on a larger scale than the mnni-
     holds his own.                          foitcd cargo and cargo, but no attempt has been made
      Coffee—Shows a fair incrcaso duo to low prices   to frame an estimate.
     *hich encouraged imports.                 Again, no note whatever is taken in the Customs
      Oilman's stores.—Tho enormous incrcaso nndcr   rcturnB of the Arab coast, whereas we know for
     th:s heading is due to imports for the use of His   a fact that the Arab coast which is, after India and
     \NvstVs ship*. It is probable that a rirailar   the United States, Maskat’a best customer (specie
    remark applies to " fruit” nnd “vegetables”   not included • took R7,52,S10 woith of specie, pre­
    which admit of no comparison with previous figures   sumably to help to finance tho pearl trade. There
    ^ these two articles were included in the “ Alis-   was not much room for speculation in dollar-? during
    ctHancoas * figures of previous years.   tho year under report, so this fruitful cause of specie
      Wines and spirits—Show a very large increase. It   remittances must be ruled out- If it were not for
    Is not suggested that consumption in Maskat itself   this large item of specie, which is no new thing and
    is increasing in tho same proportion, hut Maskat is   must have been omitted in error, the export trade of
    fiit becoming a distributing ccntro for the rest of the   Maskat sho\'6 a re rarkable decline. All countries
    Gclf. Neiiher the manifests nor Customs export   have suffered rxcept negligible rntrios fer Germany
    returns show any export of inportaace, but ships*   and tho United Kingdom and Zanzibar.
    stewards and others, buying at Maskat, retail at other   How far the general decline is due to the tempo­
    s -al’.er ports to 3 largo extent. The increase in this   rary paralysis of the arms tTr.de and I ot far to
    ,v-ort is especially large from tho United Kingdom   exaggerated figures in the past it is impossible to say.
    oi'Ir.e to unprecedented consignments of whisky.  For purposes of comparis-n, cutting out the two
      T:r silver.—This large item and, from a statisti­  large items of specie already mentioned ar.d a cotton
    cs] point of view, the saving of our import returns is   and silk trade to Zanzibar valued at roughly tllakbs
    sltnoit eutiiely new. If this item were ruled out,   of rupees, the total exrort trade La3 fallen from 41 to
    aid it has really nothing to do with Maskat trade,   31 lakhs or roughly 25 percent.
    inpjrts would show a decline for the year of nearly   As tho date crop, our main export, was a bumpier
    40 per cent instead of 26 per cent. Very little   one, there is no very good reason to account for this
    of this bar silver is used by the local silvermiths.   serious fall. Sailing vessel returns are not included
    It is destined for re-export to the Cutch ports with   and they may alter these figures considerably.
    a view to avoiding tho heavy 15 per cent. Indian   Dates to a lakh and a half of rupees and other
    duty on imported silver.                 articles about half a lakh would probably cover the
      Perfumery—Included Eau do Cologne and Florida   legitimate coasting trade.
    water which, it is said, are largely re-exported to the   Towards the e? d of the year, however, a large
    Kathiawar ports and are said to be drunk there or   expert of bar silver to the Kutch ports—a new
    perhaps used for perfuming intoxicating drinks.  departure—set in. Exact figures are not procurable,
      It maybe noted here that a rough estimate of the   hut an estimate shows that at least 7 lakhs worth
    Post Office trade in costly scents is said to be   must have been thus exported.
    R&. 12,000. About 150 parcels of *Ud’ (al-o wood)   To examine exports ia detail, only two artiolee
    valicd at R13.500 are imported through the Post   show an increase, dates and cotton goods.
    Office from India.                         Dates—Show a total of R19,76,115, or an increase
      Miscellaneous.—With regard to the remaining   of R2,55,485 or 14*85 pxr cent. This was only to be
    ^nicies, no comparison is possible with the retaras   expected and a close examination of the figures of
    of previous yeai-8, as they were all included under   previous years in Tuble Xo. 2-C, coupled wiih Major
    the head of “Miscellaneous.” Some atte mpt has   Trevor’s remark under date export of last year,
        made this year to differentiate between the   would seem to show that the rise should be very
    various classes of goods with a view to obtaining   much larger. The reason for the fall in the export
    0019 generally accurate figures ard to enable   to the United States of 1 lakh is not clear.
    fluctuations to be observed in future yoarB. It will
    he teen throughout that India holds her own.  Cotton Goods—The rise in cotton goods from the
                                             R&. 28,696 of last y»-ar to this year s figure of
      Exports*—-1The total value of expoita for the year   Rs. *2,49.855, showing an increase of Ka. 2,21,159 or
    ueder review amounted to Rs. 40,65,512 and show a   770 69 per cent., is purely fictitious. Probably the
     ecrc&se of Ra. 98,195 or 2 37 per cent., compared   trade has as a fact fallen. The Customs returns
    J1,, 'he figures for 1909-10 which stood at   show that this year’s export was only Ra. 35,252.
    fi«A707.
                                             The reason is that undoubtedly in past years’ returns
         ». D,
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88