Page 186 - The Pirate Coast (By Sir Charles Belgrave)
P. 186

!



                   at this time established their rule over part of the Arabian mainland
                   as well as over Qatar. Khalifah’s son Mohammed aspired to take
                   his father’s place as joint ruler and after some time he was awarded
                   a measure of authority by Shaikh Abdulla, which was the signal
                   for an outbreak of family quarrels among the sons, nephews and
                   grandsons of the old Shaikh.
                     In 182S, the Sultan of Muscat attacked Bahrain in spite of the
                   efforts of the British to dissuade him from doing so. He landed
                   with a large force but preparations had been made for the defence
                   of the islands, such as blocking the entrance of the harbour by
                   sinking numbers of boats filled with rocks. The Sultan was de­
                   feated with heavy losses and narrowly escaped being captured,
                   he was saved by his Nubian guards, who carried him, wounded,
                   back to his ship. For many months after this engagement the
                   people of Bahrain used to find the bodies of the Muscatis washed
                   up into their fish traps. Once again, during the fight, some of
                   his Arab troops changed sides, this time it was the Beni Yas tribe
                   who deserted him and joined the Khalifah. In 1829, a peace was
                   made between Bahrain and Muscat.
                     The combination of Shaikh Abdulla and his great nephew
                   Shaikh Mohammed bin Khalifah was not a happy one. Bahrain
                   became devastated by civil wars, as each Shaikh brought in Arabs
                   from the mainland to support his cause. There was a general
                   exodus of the Shia inhabitants to other places in the Gulf such as
                   Katif and Muscat, to avoid being involved in the quarrels of the
                   Khalifah, owing to this the population was greatly reduced.
                   Shaikh Mohammed was a forcible personality. There are con­
                   flicting descriptions of his character. One writer describes him
                   as ‘a man who combined in himself the worst qualities of a tyrant,
                   the most unbridled lust, and greed for wealth, an uncontrollable
                   temper, ignorance and impatience against restraint’. Elsewhere
                   it is said of him, ‘His good deeds bear testimony of his fine resolve
                   and sound judgement, he was master of great courage and forti­
                   tude, and had the merits of shrewdness, majesty, gravity and
                   cheerfulness’. Thirty-five years ago, an old man who, as a
                   youth, had met Shaikh Mohammed when he was living in exile
                   at Mecca, described him to me as ‘short and stout, very fond of
                   women, even in his old age, and a great talker’.
                     During 1837, Shaikh Abdulla had trouble with the Qatar tribes
                   who owed allegiance to the Khalifah. They revolted against his
                                               160
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191