Page 76 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol IV_Neat
P. 76

V



                                       70

                    til© Anglo-llussian Convention is likely to
                     oxcrcisb, sooner or later, upon the question of
                     railway construction in Porsia.
                      “ As you arc aware, the Convention provides
                    that neither of the Contracting Powers shall,
                     without previous nrrangoment between them,
                    oppose the grant of Concessions supported by the
                    other within tho limits of tho neutral zone, where
                    equality of commercial opportunity is likowiso
                    recognized to tho subjects of third Powers.
                      "It may, indeed, safoly be surmised that other
                    Powers will not bo slow to appreciate tho chnngod
                    situation, and to seek to turn it to advantage.
                      "Although the Russo-Persian Railway Con­
                    vention has still some years to run, the question
                    of future railway construction in Persia, and the
                    pledges made to His Majesty's Government by
                    the two late Shahs must not be lost sight of, and
                    a timely decision should be taken as to what
                    Concessions it would be most conducive to tho
                    interests of British policy to obtain for railway
                    construction in Southern Persia.
                      " In these circumstances, it seems advisable that
                    His Majesty’s Government should takfe into early
                    consideration the question of a possible attempt
                    to extend the Bagdad Railway into Southern
                    Persia, with a view to determining whether a
                    Concession of this nature to other Powers should
                    be opposed, or whether it should be forestalled
                    by timely action on the part of His Majesty's
                    Government, who, by securing prior rights of
                    construction, might render an extension of tho
                    Bagdad Railway under foreigu auspices economi­
                    cally undesirable.
                      " Sir E. Grey is unwilling that the history of
                    the Bagdad Railway Concession, which at one
                    time could have been secured to British enter­
                    prise, should find a counterpart in Persia.
                    Moreover, the extension of the Bagdad Railway,
                    as a  foreign undertaking, in the direction of the
                    Indian frontier, would, on strategic grounds,
                    appear to be inadmissible; the grant of such a
                    Concession would compel the opposition of II is
                    Majesty’s Government, and a sharp diplomatic
                    conflict would ensue, whereas by tho exercise
                    of foresight such a crisis might be averted
                    altogether.
                      “ Turning now to the question of what specific
                    action His Majesty’s Government should take to
                    tho end in view, it appears to Sir E. Grey that a
                    British Concession for a railway from Bunder
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81