Page 77 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 77

-53-




               treasures. With their treasures they sent artisans, mustered
               from their land, carriers of the headpad, a copper chariot,
               copper tools, vessels of the workmanship of their land,—at the
               destruction of Babylon. [Luckenbill 1927:438]

       Fragmentary mention was made again during the reign of Essarhaddon (680-669
       B.C.), who proclaimed himself to be king of the kings of Dilmun, Magan, and
       Meluhha as well as the four regions of the world. Thus, until the seventh century
       B.C., Dilmun appeared to be on the periphery of the southern Mesopotamian
       struggles, but with a strong appreciation for the Assyrian point of view.
               "The island entered the full limelight of Assyrian foreign policy with the
       offensive of Assurbanipal against southern Mesopotamia, Bit-Iakin, and Elam"
       (Oppenheim 1954:16). Assurbanipal offered the kingship of Dilmun to the Hundaru
       in return for their allegiance in the conflicts between Assyria and Babylonia.
       Oppenheim considered this a reflection of a provincial relationship between Dilmun
       and Babylon at that time (ca. 652 B.C.), but it more reasonably shows the extent to
       which the Assyrian king was willing to reach in search of allies.
               Tribute to Assyria from Dilmun frequently consisted of bronze tools,
       spices, perfume, and rare woods, indicating renewed trade with distant sources.
       This is in contrast to the Kassite period agricultural exports and provides a clue to
       renewed maritime contacts with the southern Gulf region (Oppenheim 1954). In
       support of this case is Assurbanipal's inscription in the Temple of Ishtar at Nineveh
       where, as Oppenheim notes, Dilmun, Magan, and Meluhha were mentioned again as
       sources of stone and timber. The lands identified as Magan and Meluhha may have
       changed since these names were first mentioned in the third millennium (Gelb
       1970), but contact with India during this period is identified by Toussaint (1966), who
       cites mention of Assurbanipal and Assyria in Indian historical documents. The final
       mention of Dilmun came at the end of the Neo-Babylonian dynasty,          An
       administrative document dated to the eleventh year of Nabonidus (567 B.C.)
       discussed the governorship of Dilmun as having been held by Nabopolassar (ca.
       628 B.C.) or Nebuchadnezzar H (ca. 604-562 B.C.). Little concrete information
       can be derived from these documents other than an approximate range of
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82