Page 75 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 75

-51-




       Nippur, and, as Cornwall (1952) describes, these were from a provincial official in
       Dilmun to his superiors in Mesopotamia. The names referred to are Akkadian, a
       fact that led Cornwall to identify the key administrative relationship of Dilmun
       with Mesopotamia. Raiding by apparent nomadic groups, referred to as ahlamu was
       evident.  These groups had, in fact, carried off dates awaiting shipment to
       Mesopotamia. The mood was one of despair. Cornwall went on to infer from the
       mention of nomads that Dilmun was located on the mainland as well as the islands
       and was composed of an older element of villages reconciled to outside political
       control.  Ttie ahlamu probably represent part of a widespread movement of
       Aramean tribes during the first and second millennia B.C. and indicate a period of
       stress for Dilmun. Cuneiform tablets have also been recovered from Kassite period
       buildings on Bahrain. These buildings we re destroyed by fire. Radiocarbon dates
       obtained from charred date pits dated this destruction to 1180 B.C., which
       correlates with a calibrated date of 1340-1370 B.C. (Ralph, Michael and Han 1973)—
       roughly contemporay with the Kassite letters from Nippur.
                Oppenheim (1954) presented these same letters as evidence to identify
       Dilmun as an agricultural center based upon its sole resource—artesian water. He
       also saw no evidence for tributary political connections between Dilmun and
       Mesopotamia until the reign of Burnaburiash n, when the evidence indicates closer
       ties. Obviously the data base is fragmentary and should be viewed in a broader
       historical framework, but, there is a strong indication of a late Kassite political
       and commercial presence on Bahrain and possibly the Arabian coast.
                The Kassite period represents a distinct change from the Barbar II phase.
       The texts provide the first tangible evidence that Bahrain was exposed to hostile
       relations with nomads from the unsettled hinterlands of Arabia.  Whether this
       condition existed earlier is conjectural, but at least one historical source (Taylor
       1856, cited in Stiffe 1901) claimed that the mythical tribe of Thammud migrated to
        Awal (Bahrain) from Yemen during the early second millennium B.C. The second
        millennium appears to have been a significant period of shifting power among the
        major states of the Middle East. Thus, the Kassite Dynasty was under pressure
        from many quarters.













 I
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80