Page 149 - Arabian Studies (I)
P. 149

m


          The Yemenite Settlement ofThacbat                            133

            10.  cUqud, IV, 324.
            11.  c Uqud, IV, 360.
            12.  cUqud, IV, 377—8. The English translation, I, 286, has Macqiliyy,
          following the Arabic text, but Redhousc’s note, III, 161, n. 1066,givesMaqiliyy,
          the ideal name, he suggests, for the place where one takes one’s
         mid-day nap! Some of the verses are on IV, 378 80. Ghayat, 537, under year
         793 (1390-1), mentions that the Zaydf imam, Salah al-bfn, built a palace at
         Zafar. No other could compare with this palace except that built in Thacbat by
         al-Malik al-Mu’ayyad, the author writes.
            13.  cUqud, IV, 380—1.
            14.  cUqud, IV, 382.
            15.  cUqiid, IV, 403.
            16.  cUqiid, V, 3-6; Lofgren, Arabische Texte, 113; Ghayat, 495, who calls
         the wazTr Amir Yusuf b. Mansur.
            17.  cUqud, V, 60-1 and 125-6; C. J. Johannscn, Historia lemenae (Ibn
         aI-Daybac, Bughyat al-MustaJTd JT A khbar Madinat Zabid, Bonn 1828, 164;
         Ghayat, 519, under the year 764 (1362-3), the year of the death of al-Mujahid.
         Could this have been the mosque which Niebuhr saw? Cf. n. 4 above.
            18.  cUqud, V, 62—5; Arabische Texte, 227-9.
            19.  QUqud, V, 127.
            20.  cUqiid, V, 223. This is a stock epithet given to a town of some
         importance.
            21.  cUqiid, V, 234.
            22.  cUqud, V, 239.
            23.  cUqud, V, 265.
            24.  Ghayat, 565.
            25.  I am grateful to Mr N. M. Lowick of the British Museum with whom I
         was able to discuss this section and who gave me valuable information on the
         unpublished coins in the British Museum.
            26.  Cf. W. F. Prideaux, ‘Coins of the Benee Rasool Dynasty of South
         Arabia’, Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, XVI,
         1883-5, 12-13; S. Lane-Poole, Catalogue of the Oriental Coins of the British
         Museum, London 1890, X, 60 and H. Niitzel, ‘Miinzen der Rasuliden nebst
         einem Abriss der Geschichte dieser jemenischen Dynastie*, Zeitschrift fur
         Numismatik, XVIII, 1892, 127.
            27.  The earliest coin struck in Tacizz which has been traced is one dated
         594/1197-8. Cf. P. Balog, ‘Dirhems ayoubites inedits du Yemen\ Bulletin de
         TInstitut Egyptien, 1953-4, 350.
            28.  Cf. E. de Zambaur, Munzpragungen des Islam, Wiesbaden 1968, 89.
            29.  There is an unpublished coin of this date in the B.M. There was probably   I
         a much longer break in the minting of coins in Tacizz between the years
         669-740/1270-1340. There is another unpublished B.M. coin of the former
         date and for the latter, cf. Zambaur, Munzpragungen, 89.
           30.  ‘Coins’, 9.
           31.  It should be stressed that the number of Rasulid coins preserved cannot
         be fully representative of RasOlid mint activity as a whole. Fresh issues may
         come to light which might necessitate the alteration of the views expressed here.
           32.  Munzpragungen, 94.

                                                                                      i



                                                                                      !
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154