Page 6 - Constitutional Model for a Democratic South Africa By Prof Vuyisle Dlova
P. 6

TOWARDS A NON RACIAL, MAJORITARIAN AND QUASI-FEDERAL CONSTITUTION IN
                                                     SOUTH AFRICA

            Vuyisile Dlova

            THE SCOPE OF THE PAPER

            The purpose of this paper is to make a modest contribution to the debate on the constitutional
            future of South Africa, after the demise of apartheid.  The article is not a projection into the
            future in the sense of predicting future developments.  It has a more limited, and hopefully
            less hazardous, objective of attempting to answer the question as to what type or form of
            constitution can best suit the political facts and realities of the present day South Africa.


            The word constitution in this article is used in its narrow sense, that is to mean, a set of
            written rules, possessed of some degree of legal sanctity, which seek to define the various
            organs of government and also set out their powers, functions and duties and their relations
                                                  1
            inter se and with the public at large.
            In these few pages it is not possible to deal with all issues of fundamental importance that
            often form part of modern constitutions.  I will therefore confine myself to a selection of those
            issues that seem to me most pertinent in the case of South Africa.

            The questions I have posed and which I attempt  to deal with, therefore, are the following;
            who should have franchise rights in South Africa?; should South Africa be a unitary or a
            federal state (or a mixture of the two); should South Africa adopt a presidential system of
            government (or should power or the exercise of executive authority be lodged on some
            person other than the head of state as is the case in the Westminster model); should South
            Africa be a “one-party democracy” or not; finally, should the constitution guarantee individual
            rights?

            Such involved issues cannot be adequately addressed without examining first the political and
            social realities that such constitutional propositions seek to address, and hopefully, resolve.

            We need therefore to identify not only the competing interest groups but also the interests or
            constitutional ambitions of the individual groupings themselves.


            Since the forces at play are bound to be many and varied only the most important will be
            mentioned in our brief background note.

            BACKGROUND

            Constitutional history

            The present day South Africa came into political being as a result of an act of union of four
            political entities, all of which enjoyed a status of responsible government within the British
            Empire at the time of their coming together.  The entities involved were the two long time
            colonies of the Cape and the Natal, and the two former “Boer” Republics of Transvaal and
            Orange Free State, which had since their surrender to the imperial forces, in 1902, become
            part of the British Empire.  The union was a “voluntary act”, a product of three months of
            intense negotiation, behind closed doors, of the representatives of the white settlers in all the
            four territories.  At the end of that period a draft constitution had been drawn.  It was this draft
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11