Page 11 - Constitutional Model for a Democratic South Africa By Prof Vuyisle Dlova
P. 11

It should be stressed however, that the big cities, especially those in the Transvaal, do not
            follow the pattern described above; most of them are populated by people who come from
            different parts of the country and who have been partially or wholly detribalised and therefore
            see themselves foremost as Azanians/South Africans.  This, of course, does not imply that
            the rural people also do not see themselves in the broader context of a nation.

            Unitary settler administration over the Africans


            A related question to the issue of nationalities is whether the establishment of a Union of
            White South Africa in 1910 did serve the cause of nation building amongst the indigenous
            peoples.  At a broad level, that is, in so far as the Union of the settlers necessitated an African
            countervailing force of equal geographical proportion heralding as it did the birth of the Native
            Congress and the beginning of national as opposed to nationality politics amongst the people
            of indigenous descent, the answer to the question we have posed in this section is in the
            affirmative.  However, if we ask the question in a more specific sense and ask ourselves
            whether the Union of South Africa meant unitary institutions for the African people, then the
            answer should be in the negative.  While the Union meant a centrally coordinated overall
            policy over the natives, for the Africans themselves the policy was calculated to further
            fragment them.

                                                                                                        12
            The executive power over all natives was vested in the Governor-General of the Union.   The
            administration of the natives also, in accordance with the constitution, vested in the same
                 13
            man.   The executive authority over the Africans was to be exercised, however, by a
            Secretary of State for Native Affairs.  The Secretary of State for Native Affairs was to enjoy
            wide discretionary powers which included the power to issue proclamations relating to the
            administration of Africans.  He also was to enjoy the benefit of advice of a statutory group of
                                                 14
            “expert” advisors, on Native Affairs,  in the exercise of his wide ranging powers.  For
            purposes of Native administration, South Africa was divided into six districts.  The divisions, it
            was said, were not to be ethnical, but insofar as they in practice approximated the territorial
            spread of the major indigenous groupings, they definitely did take that turn.  For example, the
            Zulu people in the whole of the Natal, including the so-called Zululand, had their regional
            administrative headquarters Pietermaritzburg.  In other words, although overall authority over
            the African people vested in the white legislature and the white Native Secretary of State, the
            actual administration, which included issue of proclamation, was to be territorially based.  The
            whole system of Native administration, therefore, had the effect of perpetuating and
            institutionalising separation of nationalities, in particular, the bigger ones.
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16