Page 29 - SuDS Design & Evaluation Guide-Newham V4 Spreads
P. 29

In most locations the water table is likely to   studies and LLFA detailed requirements can   LLFA, in its Statutory Consultee function,   SuDS, nor LCY’s objection accepted without
 Local SuDS requirements
 be found at depths of less than 3 metres.   be found on Newham webpage as below:  requires that greenfield runoff calculations   site specific evidences and mitigation
 Ground water source protection zones are   LB Newham Flooding Webpage  should be performed using the IH124 method   requirements provided to be evaluated by
 found in the northern part of the borough.  as supported by the HR Wallingford UK SuDS   Newham Local Planning Authority.
 Flood Risk and Sustainable Drainage:   online greenfield runoff rate estimation tool.

 Requirements and Guidance for Planning   Under the same concern greenfield   London City Airport guidance on biodiversity
 Application  calculations should adopt the default          and safeguarding
 Newham Local Plan  parameters (e.g. soil type) as provided by the   Pre-planning advice                           Local SuDS requirements
      UK SuDS tool as characteristic of the                  Newham LLFA can provide pre-application
 Newham LLFA drainage pro-forma
      application site location.                             advice for developments as part of a pre-
 Planning Application Requirements
      Newham LLFA will not object to greenfield              application consultation agreement with
 Highlights of main requirements:   runoff calculations based on Flood   Newham Local Planning Authority.

 Fig.5 Newham’s main made ground   •  All major development is required to   Estimation Handbook (FEH) methodology,   Please note that a fee specific to LLFA
 (grey/grey hatched) and source   restrict post development runoff to   provided that the results are demonstrated to   services is required:
 protection zones (shades of pink)
 greenfield runoff rates unless it can be   be largely consistent with IH124 methodology   Pre-Application Advice Guidance Note &
 The combination of these factors may limit   demonstrated that site conditions prohibit   output from UK SuDS online tool and   Charging Schedule
 potential for infiltration drainage. However,   the ability to do so.  representative of the application site in a
 given the high variability in ground conditions   •  All development must restrict runoff   pre-development greenfield condition.    LLFA advice can include providing specific
 found across the borough, it is recommended   discharge within or to Critical Drainage   Newham LLFA does not accept the following   information on local flood risk, review of
 that developers carry out thorough ground   Areas (CDA) to greenfield rates or below.   approaches:  information provided by developer relevant
 investigations to establish the potential for   N.B. there are 15 CDAs in Newham.  •  urban soil types for Greenfield runoff   to the SuDS design and making
                                                             recommendations on compliance with local
 23   infiltration.  It should be noted that none of   •  Discharge to tidal water (i.e.  River   estimation   and national policies.  24
 the above prevents use of SuDS within a
 Thames, Lea and Roding) will need to   •  applying urban catchment parameters to
 development, if integrated into the design at   runoff estimation   The above could be arranged by contacting
 an early stage. In any case, above ground no   take account of the effect of “tide   Newham Planning Authority development.
 locking”, storm surge or submergence of   Local LPA and Stakeholder Engagement
 infiltration SuDS measures can still be used in             control@newham.gov.uk
 areas of contaminated ground provided that   the outfall, in order to prevent flooding.    In addition to LLFA the Environment Agency
 An appropriate allowance in terms of                        Adoption of SuDS
 barriers to contain contaminants, such as   and Thames Water must be consulted with
 impermeable liners, are used to protect   onsite storage should be built into the   concern of flood risk, discharge consents,   Newham will not adopt SuDS unless
 drainage strategy.                                          undertaken by LB of Newham on council
 groundwater.  building in proximity to flood defences
 •  Discharge to tidal water may not be   structures and watercourses.   owned land.  Applicants should therefore put
 Local SuDS specific requirements   restricted to greenfield provided scour/  London City Airport (LCY): Under concern of   in place arrangements for maintenance and
 erosion would not result, however a level                   end of life replacement of SuDS. Details must
 Newham has developed a number of   of attenuation will be expected - normally   risk management (i.e. bird strike) LCY may   be provided to the LLFA to add to its asset
 documents in connection with local flood risk   object to development proposal deemed   register. There are other Risk Management
 assessment and management. Main   a 1 in 30 attenuation - to create SuDS   potentially to increase of bird presence in the   Authorities, such as Thames Water or TFL
 features that provide additional benefits.
 requirements applicable to major   airport safeguard area. Whilst this concern   that may be willing to consider adoption of
 development are fully embodied in Newham’s   Application of Greenfield Runoff Rates  should be heeded and early consultation with   SuDS. Early engagement with the relevant
 local policy (Newham Local Plan 2018).   To enable consistency of assessment   City Airport is advised, LCY’s general concern   party is critical to ensure their requirements

 Links to relevant Newham policy, flood risk   between planning applications, Newham   should never be used to scope out   can be achieved.
      requirement of green infrastructures,  such


 Newham Council SuDS D & E Guide                                                                       © 2020 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates  Newham Council SuDS D & E Guide                                                                        © 2020 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34