Page 248 - Coincidences in the Bible and in Biblical Hebrew
P. 248

227
          CHAPTER 16  SPECIAL LETTERS IN THE BIBLE
          CHAPTER 16   SPECIAL LETTERS IN THE BIBLE                         227

          Gaon of Vilna that the written expresses the “internal and true meaning,” while
          the read expresses the “outwardly appearance,” we may now pursue the Gaon of
          Vilna, explaining why the written “line” and the read “line” differ, and how is this

          significant.
                                                    18
             We start with the read “line.” The Hebrew kav  is correctly written with two
          letters:
                                106 = (6 = ו) + (100 = ק)


                                                           18
             However, in the above verse in the Bible, the word kav  is written  differently
          within the text, though still read the same (how the word should be read is written,
          correctly, at the margin of the page, opposite the line where the “line” appears).
                        18
          The written kav  is
                           111 = (5 = ה) + (6 = ו) + (100 = ק)


             This is a bizarre word of three letters that has no meaning in Hebrew (at least
                                                             18
          not in the way it is supposed to be pronounced here, as kav).  Thus, although the
          word is read as “line,” it is misspelled in the text, having a third letter added (the
          letter hei), supposedly by mistake.
             How can this be explained?
             The answer is that there are places in the Bible where words appear that are tra-
          ditionally differently read than written. This was alluded to in subsection 16.1.3,
          where several examples were given. In that subsection, the principle underlying
          these incidents, as explained by the Gaon of Vilna , was detailed.
             Having this principle in mind, we now follow in the footsteps of the Gaon of

          Vilna in reference to the above quotation. Obviously, while the outward appear-
          ance is that the “line” has a length of 30 (this is what the text conveys to us),
          the “inner truth” is that the length is somewhat different. How much different?
          Knowing the importance that the Hebrew attaches to the numerical values of
          words, we may suspect that the unknown “true” length, denoted by X, relates to
          the outward appearance—namely 30—the same way that the numerical value of
          the written word (which represents the “internal truth”) relates to the numerical
          value of the read word (which represents “appearances”).
             A simple calculation yields


              Numerical value of written word / Numerical value of read word =
                      Numerical value of (הוק) / Numerical value of (וק)
                                       = 111 / 106
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253