Page 18 - EPSI Magazine Issue 8 final 2018.indd
P. 18

15





              Apart from the carbon emissions associated         num for the past decade, had plummeted to 5.3%
          with the majority of these energy sources this article   per annum in 2017. This will quickly be met and
          singles out deforestation as the most severe dan-      overtaken by the leap in supply during the com-
          ger to the environment in Uganda. Between 1990         ing one year if not earlier. The supply will strongly
          and 2012 forest cover in Uganda decreased by 40%       be augmented by off-grid solar based systems,
          to 29,880 sq Km. Firewood, inefficiently produced      which in recent times has received a shot-in-the-
          charcoal (45% conversion on energy basis) and out-     arm from the now abundant green bucks seeking
          right quest for agricultural land have left the coun-  investment in green energy sources as well as the
          try bare and in need of urgent reforestation, which    rapidly dropping cost of the solar technology.
          is not happening any time soon in any significant
          amounts.                                                    However, the latter is only a short to medium
                                                                 term solution for the hard to reach areas unless
              Fortunately, the country is blessed with renew-    equal effort will be expended to productive use
          able sources for generation of electricity such as     of solar systems. The deployment of most of the
          large hydro sites, mini and small hydro sites, solar   stand-alone Solar Home Systems (SHS) is mainly
          and geothermal potential. Government’s prudent         growing rapidly in urban and peri-urban areas
          policy of liberalization (in spite of this policy’s cur-  due to awareness and availability compared to
          rent criticism) has led to rapid interest to invest in   the deep rural areas.  Grid connected solar (and its
          generation from private sector developers/inves-       sister net-metered solar) is no different from the
          tors. The nation’s generation installed capacity from   traditional grid supplied generation from large
          such resources is set to double from the current       hydro or other renewables.
          930MW (with peak demand a mere 630MW inclu-
          sive of exports) to above 1,800MW within the next           Off-grid distribution networks have been
          twelve months. While growth in electricity demand      found expensive (and maybe unsustainable) for
          is high (estimated at 10% per annum) this surge in     the rural communities.  They are often started
          generation capacity will need to be availed to the     with heavy short-term subsidization from donor
          over 78% Ugandans with no direct access to modern      agencies.  A combination of a lack of formal tariff
          electricity.                                           approvals and being unsolicited in set-up these
                                                                 off-grid systems have proved costly to the rural
              Unfortunately, the country’s planners or imple-    folks; consumer tariffs typically are twice those on
          menters of government plans have taken a lackluster    the main grid and supply quality often lower.
          attitude to disposing of the “excess supply” coming
          our way to the populace. Firstly, it was assumed that       The higher cost has many causes such as
          the private sector, especially UMEME Limited, will     limited connected client numbers on the system
          enthusiastically invest in the distribution network    and  relatively  larger  energy losses  on  a smaller
          and the rest will be done by the rather feeble efforts   off-grid. Rural consumers initially enthused to get
          of the Rural Electrification Agency (REA) in this di-  connected quickly discover that the consumption
          rection. Some are optimistically looking at the ev-    price is beyond their meagre incomes leading to
          er-delayed major projects (Standard Gauge Railway,     early disconnections. Matters are compounded
          the 22 Industrial Parks to name two) to take up the    by the eventual arrival of the often-cheaper na-
          excess power, relegating the needs of the unserved     tional grid electricity. Consumers on the off-grid
          78% of the nearly 40 million Ugandans to terms like    cannot wait to get on the national grid.
          “low value future clients”. These unserved Ugandans
          could become useful consumers if guided by ap-              The above presents regulatory conflicts:
          propriate government effort into productive use of     should off-grid systems be allowed and at what
          electricity.                                           tariffs? Or should the affected community be left
                                                                 unserved to wait for the arrival of the national
              The  UNMET  Energy  Distribution  Challenge        grid?
          For Uganda
                                                                      It is believed that the lack of a clear regula-
              The growth in demand estimated at 10% per an-      tory framework for the off-grid systems explains
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23